Nb#10 has been installed on TM2 . electrical and leak check on HS line are good. See attachment.

TM2 Nb#10 has been connect at TCS. TCS water system and vacuum system have been started. Everything looks ok so far. TCS Faraday cage is secured for TM2 conditioning at TCS.

 TM2 with new target Nb#10 was moved to ITW from TCS and re-connected in pit. TPs are running at their full speed. 

 TM2 with target Nb#10 was disconnected in ITW yesterday for beam production issue investigation.

Nb#10target has been remotely  transferred from NHC to SHC. 

Nb#10 never worked online - repeller had no effect on the beam and one of the RF wires was touching HVC. Max 60pA was seen on the source cup. See notes here ITW-TM2-Nb#10/#11-LP-IGLIS  (Web view)

Target was handled roughly after use - kicked around in NHC for a long time, then loaded into a pail (multipin had to be dettached for this) then moved to SHC, unloaded from pail, then plates covering the RF electrodes had to be pried off. Lots of knocking and shaking.

Theory was that the repeller wire was disconnected. But found it not obviously broken, had good continuity from the ring tongue to the end of the wire pulled out of the multipin, even after all the abuse. Same for the RF (from the end of the electrode to the end of the wire pulled out of the multipin). Did find some of the multipin wires were flaky - if moved around they showed intermittent shorts to HVC. But not clear if this is from the rough handling afterwards or not. The problem was not in the module since NB#11 ran immediately afterwards with no issues. Most likely culprit seems to be the insulation beads on the wires. Should look for more robust insulation solutions. On the other hand, the connections of the wires to the electrodes seems very good.

Still not sure why no effect of the repeller was seen. Could be a intermittent break/short, though this seems unlikely. Maybe the connection in the multipin was not good? I did not get a chance to inspect that.

 Nb#10 was placed in pail#295 and moved from the south hot cell to the spent target vault, spot 4A, it was 230uSv/hr when removed from the SHC. See attached PDF for vault details.

 TM1 was high voltage tested without a target on November 16, 2011 with Don Jackson, Pierre Bricault, and Bevan Moss. The module was able to hold up to 25 kV but between that and 32 kV there was lots of discharge which could be measured in the vacuum. See the attached plot for the voltage current and sparks.

(Copy of e-mail correspondence sent June 20th 2012)

After some discussions this morning I’ve decided on the following best path forward for TM3 at the Hot Cell leading up to the Canada Day long weekend.

General Goals:

-          Blank-off TM3 water line terminations (coil, heat shield, water-cooled window)

-          Test sliding tray removal tool to determine fit on TM3 chassis

We will skip the Conditioning Station leak tests and return TM3 directly to a silo for the following reasons:

-          We will have a visitor next week and this will impact Chad’s time available to do Hot Cell work

-          Helium pressure leak checks on the blanked-off circuits are only one small portion of a large set of diagnostic tests (leak, electrical, HV, etc.) that must ultimately be performed on TM3 to determine its fitness. This full set of tests must be carefully documented in a procedure and executed systematically when there is adequate time at the CS to do all of them, with results recorded.  There is currently not adequate time for this work between now and Canada Day.

-          If we were to detect a leak from one of these tests, it would not tell us anything about where the leak is in that given circuit (there are multiple possible points).  The service cap would have to be opened regardless, which we don’t have time for.

-          The aforementioned bullets above lead me to conclude that the extra work required for two module moves for one set of partial leak checks is not a value-added exercise: In other words, the module will have to go back to the CS, regardless of what we do over the next week for more tests.  The time savings of trying to squeeze it in next week are really negligible and it makes for a tight schedule for not much benefit.

Chad:  Please prepare a detailed work plan for your hot cell jobs including a list of the tools required and what leak checks you will do specifically after you have installed the blank-offs.  You may refer to existing procedures if you already have these written.  I would like to review this plan and I am expecting that an e-log will be filed daily and this work plan should be referred to as an attachment.

Proposed Schedule Jun 20 to 29

Wednesday Jun 20 (1 working day)

-          Setup for TM3 move from Silo to HC (Travis, David)

Thursday Jun 21 (1 working day)

-          TM3 moved from silo to HC (Travis, Don Dale, David)

Friday Jun 22 to Wednesday Jun 27 (4 working days)

-          Chad performs the following HC work on TM3:

·         Removes containment box

·         Installs water-line blank-offs

·         Checks Sliding Tray Removal Tool Fit

-          Vacuum leak checks of blanked-off lines at the HC (Chad, David, VG)

-          Chad buttons up TM3

-          In parallel - David performs block moves as required

Thursday Jun 28 (1 working day)

-          TM3 moved from HC to Silo (Travis, Don Dale, David)

Friday Jun 29 (1 working day)

-          Contingency

RH Group: Please move ahead with the work as outlined above.  Please comment if you have any concerns or proposed changes to this plan.  Thanks very much to all for your assistance,

Grant

-------------------------------------------------

Grant Minor, M.A.Sc., P.Eng.

TRIUMF Remote Handling Group Leader

Nuclear Engineer

4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver

BC, Canada, V6T2A3

gminor@triumf.ca

(604) 222-7359

http://www.triumf.ca/profiles/4557

-------------------------------------------------

Started refurb of TM3.

Planned activities:

Inspection

Water line blank off

Started 1:00pm

• Video inspection before containment box removed - noticed discoloration on top right (if looking from h/c window) 4" insulator
• Containment box cover removed
• Containment box removed

As I am much older, wiser and handsomer then last time I removed this style of box, I realised there was a better, safer procedure for the removal...I will be updating the doc. accordingly.

End 2:25 pm

Here are the pictures from today...there is video too but it is not uploaded yet.

On Friday, June 22 the following work was carried out.

• Further inspection of the source tray.
• Testing of existing tray removal and installation tool...it works fine, there was just a specific method for proper coupling to the target module. There was no documentation for this tool, so it took a little bit of insight with the drawings and a little trial and error. A document should be written for this tool so its proper use is documented...I will do this.
• Blank-offs installed on heat shield water lines.
• New gaskets installed on window water lines.
• Containment box re-installed.

Pictures can be found at: http://documents.triumf.ca/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-8639

TM4 was successfully moved from the South Hot Cell to the South-West Silo remotely by Grant Minor, with help from David Wang and Don Jackson.  The move was without problems.  See ISAC Work Permit 2012-12-04-1.

 Both Turbo pumps on TM3 have failed. They were both attempted to start in soft mode. TP2 could only achieve ~19kpm and TP1 ~10kpm. I have turned off the scroll pump and vented through the turbo pumps.

 Turbo Pump 2 has been replaced on TM3. I got a count of 350 on the sleeve of my tank suit.

 Turbo Pump 2 has been replaced on TM3. I got a count of 350 on the sleeve of my tank suit.

With the Turbo pump replaced I have started roughing at 10:48

 Both Turbo Pumps are now operational.

Bevan Moss wrote:

Both Turbo Pumps are now operational.

 Turbo pumps 1 and 2 both found randomly off, have been restarted

 Cooling Package was started at 9:25 this morning inlet conductivity is 0.08 Mohm at 22.9C. Resistance reached 5.33 Mohm by 11:30