Attached alignment check notes after brazing and fabrication.

First page lower half shows establishment of baseline using master jig

Second page top half shows the alignment of the target mounting plate jig and the steerer cone aperture.

Second page bottom half shows alignment of the master target jig. Master target jig needed the 9 pin and heat shield locating features removed to seat the target correctly.

Overall, source tray assembly sits .006" high on average (min .003", max .010"), .003" to the left with respect to ion beam axis.

A fully built steerer sub assembly ITA2826 revision E was boxed and sealed and put on rack storage in ISAC B2 South Hot Cell area. It is contained in a blue bin and green tag. 

It is advised if this assembly is used, it should be inspected for damage before using in a source tray.

Alignment notes attached for the optics tray for the refurbished tm3 with the new service and source tray.

*Note: Drive screw bracket sheared off during alignment check with source tray. The drive bracket was replaced. The optics tray was re checked. The front element was .015 to left and centered u/d. The rear element remained the same. The center element could not be checked to do the assembly.

 The cleanup of the ISAC Target Hall crane and installation of the new SICK laser which replaced the IBEO laser for the EW crane position was completed on Aug 03 2023.

The clean up tasks which were completed: (Removal of tape viewing camera, Removal of tape, Installation of extension cord, Consolidation of power supplies for the lasers and removal of old laser) 

Currently power bar is still present to act as an extension cable. This will be removed when 2m extension cord is made and put in next target exchange cycle.
   

The installation and testing of new SICK Laser:

1. Calibration points were taken at the 4 corner limits of the crane. North South and East West positions were recorded.

2. Crane was parked at the ladder access position and mounting bracket was machined and installed.

3. A new cable was made and installed for the SICK laser. Continuity test was performed from the control room and crane to ensure pinout of the laser worked with existing serial communication setup in the control room PC.

4. The feedback values from the new SICK laser and old IBEO laser were compared to determine that a calibration offset of 0.06m was needed in the Laser Position Feedback program.

5. Laser Position Feedback program was re-compiled to communicate with 2x SICK lasers with the calibration offset value included in the EW feedback position. (Laser Crane PositionDlg.cpp)

6. Calibration points were taken at the 4 corner limits of the crane again with the new Laser. North South and East West positions were recorded.

There was less than 0.1% variance between the new laser and old laser which is well within the tolerance of the lasers themselves. It can be determined that it was properly calibrated.

 The sealing surfaces of the module side heat shield water block were polished on September 9th in the morning using Chad's polishing tool with the following attachments:

- Scotchbrite pads  (30 seconds)  (after this step indium material from the previous seal was no longer visible on the sealing surface)

- 2000 grit sandpaper (30 seconds)

- Felt material with isopropanol (30 seconds)

- Lint free pad (30 seconds)

After the final step the surface was rinsed with isopropanol and air dried using canned air.  The water block blank-off was then installed with the manipulators, tightened until snug using the air ratchet, then tightened an additional 1/4 turn while the water block was gripped firmly using one manipulator.  The seal was leak checked and passed successfully.

On Friday April 17th, UC#12 target was installed in TM1.  One of the copper water lines was bent slightly as the target was lifted into the module which caused ~15 minute delay due to difficulty getting the VCR nut threads to engage.  Other than this the install went smoothly.

During replacement of the containment box panel two of the threaded holes were found to be stripped.  One on the top at the center, the other in the bottom right corner.  These two holes were left without fasteners (see attached photo).  It is unknown at this time whether these holes were already stripped, or if they were stripped during this installation.

 The following work was done on June 18 2015:

- Finished cleaning and polishing all water blocks on module side (white felt with isopropyl, then buffing material with isopropyl, then canned air).  Heat shield waterblock re-done because water marks visible (white scotchbrite, white felt w/ isopropyl, buffing material w/ isopropyl, then canned air).  All surfaces looked very good, no lint or scratches visible.  
- Tray installed using installation jig (jig was very difficult to slide on hot cell table).  Window circuit waterline bracket tube retaining screws had to be removed for the sourcetray to clear the module frame.  Optics tray locating mushroom on source tray rubbed against the module side waterblock jig and was pushed past.  Gas lines were held clear of the source tray with the manipulator as the it went in.  The nut on the source tray side water block guide pin had to be loosened to facilitate complete insertion of the source tray.
- Connection of waterblocks for circuits D, C, B, A, Febiad Coil 2 were done in the sequence listed with no issues
- Extraction electrode and heat shield water blocks could not be done up initially because the locking tabs could not be undone (interference with module side jig bracket)
- Ground electrode waterblock connected without issue
- Window waterblock attempted: screws would not engage
- Febiad coil 1 negative waterblock source tray side locking tab had to be re-inserted into block, then waterblock was connected
- Febiad coil 1 positive connected without issue (failed initially due to shorter screw)
- Mounting support plate waterblock alignment pins did not engage initially, rotated source tray side waterblock using polishing tool.  Then was connected without issue.
- Extraction electrode waterblock revisited: pulled together with 1-5/8" screw, then connected (with 1-3/8" screws in both holes as per ITA6144)
- Heat shield waterblock revisited: installed without issue (as the jig had been pulled together by the previous step)
- Attempted window water block again.  Right side manipulator wrist tong cable broke while using camera.  Waterblock could not be connected (holes look concentric, pins engaged, blocks together and almost flush)
- All waterblocks except window waterblock torqued (tool did not slip properly, so torque will be re-checked)

Plan for Friday June 19:
- Put blank-offs and various fasteners in hot cell through tool port
- Check torque of all waterblocks with dial torque wrench
- Attempt window water line again with different fasteners (non-blunt start), try removing both sides of waterblock alignment jigs
- Install blank-offs on window and heat shield lines (VCRs)
- Perform preliminary leak check

The containment box was taken off TM2 in preparation for installation of a new coil line isolator.

ITA6272 and ITA6273 have been received from the Scintillator Shop.  ITA6274 should be ready by the end of today.

A meeting was held on May 4, 2016 to determine the scope of the North Hot Cell project.  The following was agreed upon by those in attendance:

The NHC will be a designated target change hot cell.  It will be capable of performing all routine target operations (target removal/installation, leak check, electrical check, video inspection, post irradiation examination, target waste packaging and removal) using the same method currently used in the south hot cell.  Provisions will be included for the ability to perform target waste separation in the future unless a significant obstacle is encountered in which case the meeting attendees will be consulted.  Target waste separation involves separating the internal target heater from the target heat shield, then combining multiple target heaters in a single F-308 shipment.  Neither an inert gas atmosphere nor a double-door waste transfer system will be part of the NHC scope.

The following people were in attendance:  Bob Laxdal, Anders Mjos, Don Jackson, Joe Mildenberger, Friedhelm Ames, Alex Gottberg, Grant Minor, Yasmine Saboui, Peter Kunz

The following people were invited, but were unable to attend:  Chad Fisher, Pierre Bricault

The project will begin immediately, with Isaac Earle as the project leader.  The first steps will be to submit a Project Initiation Sheet, then to write and release the Requirements Specification document.

 The North Hot Cell was accessed today via the Ante Room for inspection, measurements, and clean-up.  There were no modules in the SHC or TCS, and no spent targets in the SHC.  Under these conditions the maximum field in the NHC was approximately 2μSv/hr.  The inside of the cell was cleaned and swept, followed by a floor swipe to check for contamination (none found).  All areas of the ante room floor were also swiped:  no contamination found.

The following measurements were taken in the NHC for comparison with the Soldiworks model:

SHC/NHC feedthrough panel fastener size:  1/4"-20,  1/2" long
NHC west wall to east edge of SEG block:  33-1/4" on south side, 33" on north side
NHC west wall to furthest extent of TCS (IRH1170): 40"
NHC west wall to wall indentation for viewing window: 46-7/8"
NHC west wall to end of existing ventilation duct: 4-1/8"

A hole was drilled in the NHC exhaust duct in the east end of the target hall above the hatch to the Ante Room.  This will be used for measuring NHC exhaust flow rate with a thermal anemometer.  The hole was tapped and plugged with an NPT tap.

Flow was measured in the existing hole in the SHC exhaust duct in approximately the same location.  Flow velocity was measured to be 1415 ft/min with the lid on the SHC.  Using duct ID 7.75", and assuming the average flow velocity is 90% of the flow at duct center, the flow rate was found to be 417cfm.  We will attempt to match this figure for the NHC when the ventilation tests are performed.  The tests have been scheduled for the maintenance day on Tuesday August 9th.

The anemometer probe and SHC test port plug were checked for contamination: none found.

Testing was performed on August 9th on the ISAC nuclear ventilation system to determine if the existing ventilation system can achieve the required cell depressions for both SHC and NHC under all expected configurations and if a proposed modification to the DDC control system can provide acceptable stability and response time for the system.  The proposed control system observes the lower of the SHC depression or the NHC depression + 10% (to avoid stability issues), and adjusts the dampers to try to achieve 250Pa (1.00" WC) depression in the area it is observing.  With the proposed control system the SHC and NHC dampers are programmed to be at the same position, but can be tuned with a bias between them if required to achieve all ventilation requirements. The NHC and SHC dampers are programmed with a limit at 90% of the fully-open position.  There is a damper in the ducting system in the section of duct after the SHC and NHC legs join together;  this is set at 50% open, and was not adjusted during the the tests.  Test summary and results are listed below:

1.  Prior to switching to SHC+NHC control mode, the flow rate and depression of the SHC was measured with the lid on:  266Pa cell depression, damper 47% open, duct flow 417cfm.  The lid was opened and the measurements repeated:  35Pa, damper 90% open, duct flow 630cfm (results in 83ft/min, 0.42m/s average flow velocity across HC module opening)

2. The control system was switched to the new SHC+NHC single control loop system. Measurements were taken with both hot cell lids closed.  SHC:  246Pa, damper 72% open, 350cfm flow rate.  NHC: 257Pa, damper 72% open, 510cfm flow rate.  The ventilation fan speed was then increased from 53Hz to 57Hz (maximum speed is 60Hz).  Measurements were taken with both hot cell lids closed.  SHC:  257Pa, damper 51% open, 353cfm flow rate.  NHC: 257Pa, damper 51% open, 515cfm flow rate.

3. The SHC module port lid was opened and the NHC lid left closed.  SHC: 37Pa, damper 90% open, 462cfm (results in 61ft/min, 0.31m/s average flow velocity across HC module opening).  NHC: 249Pa, damper 90% open, 551cfm.

4. The NHC module port lid was opened and the SHC lid closed.  SHC: 203Pa, damper 90%, 360cfm.  NHC: 33Pa, damper 90%, 648cfm (results in 85ft/min, 0.44m/s average flow velocity across HC module opening).  The fan speed was then increased to 60Hz (max speed) to see if the depression setpoint for the SHC could be achieved in this configuration.  SHC: 231Pa, damper 90%, 389cfm.  NHC: 29Pa, damper 90%, 705cfm (results in 93ft/min, 0.47m/s average flow velocity across HC module opening)

5. Both SHC and NHC module port lids were opened and the fan was left at 60Hz.  SHC: 31Pa, damper 90%, 448cfm (results in 59ft/min, 0.30m/s average flow velocity across HC module opening).  NHC: 29Pa, 90% damper, 669cfm (results in 88ft/min, 0.45m/s average flow velocity across HC module opening)

For all tests the control system arrived at a stable depression value in less than 5 minutes, and thereafter exhibited only minor fluctuations.

Notes:

Duct flow rate was calculated assuming that measured flow velocity at the center of the duct is 90% of average duct velocity.  The duct ID at the sample location is 7.75", the hot cell opening size used for SHC and NHC module opening flow velocity calculations was 33" x 33".

Duct flow velocity measurements were taken using a thermal anemometer (Model number: 9555-P, Serial number: 9555:1108059 Rev. 2.11.0, Last calibrated by Rob Walker on April 29, 2016).

After completion of the tests the system was restored to it's original configuration and the ISAC target hall was swiped for contamination: none found.  No EF12 trips occurred during these tests.

 Measurements were taken today of the NHC north/south wall gap at the location where the NHC/TCS partition wall will be installed (43.375" from the NHC west wall).  A HILTI PD40 laser range meter was used for the measurements.  They were taken at 10", 34", 62", 90", 118", and 142" from the floor which matches the top of each cross-beam.  The results are below:

10" from floor:  102.44"
34" from floor:  102.40"
62" from floor:  102.48"
90"  from floor:  102.63"
118" from floor:  102.28"
142" from floor:  102.24"

Based on these results a partition wall plate width of 102.00" will be used for the bottom two plates, and 102.25" for the upper three plates in order to keep the gap on each side approximately 1/8"

The sheet metal panel covering the NHC/SHC feedthrough port was removed today using a slide-hammer to pull out the concrete anchors (this oversized panel would have interfered with the NHC partition wall).  50cpm was found on the inside of the panel, 100cpm on the NHC side lip of the feedthrough, and 350cpm on the face of the shielding bricks in the feedthrough.  Various dimensional measurements of the feedthrough were taken which will be added to the partition wall Solidworks model (IRH1609).  The panel was bagged for disposal and a temporary 20"x20" panel was put over the feedthrough and secured with duct tape.  A permanent panel with anchored supports that is compatible with the NHC partition wall will be designed and installed at a later date.  A swipe of the NHC walls and floor picked up 30cpm after completion of the job.  

David Wang and I accessed the NHC today to check if the proposed duct routing (IRH1618) will interfere with servicing or replacement of the TCS turbo pump.  A piece of plywood was placed in the future position of the NHC/TCS partition wall (IRH1609), and a ducting elbow was placed at the approximate position of the nearest elbow to the turbo pump.

David concluded that the ducting in the proposed location will not have any significant effect on replacement of the turbo pump, and he does not expect replacement will be difficult to perform after installation of the wall and NHC ducting.  Standing at floor level towards the east side of the TCS space and reaching upwards seemed to be the best way to reach the turbo pump flange bolts.  It was also noted that there was sufficient room in the TCS space for two workers to be in the area.

 The concrete floor in the North Hot Cell service area and the top of the NHC roof block in the target hall have been painted with Macropoxy 646 oil based epoxy paint, colour Flint Grey.  Two coats were used for the NHC roof, and one for the service area floor.

 The new ducting section connecting the existing duct termination in the TCS space to the NHC partition wall has been installed by Smith Sheet Metal contractors.  The installation drawing is IRH1618.  There was not enough clearance between the duct pipe and the TCS vessel to butt weld the new ductwork as originally intended.  Instead a flange was welded to the existing pipe and also to the new section and the two were bolted together.  Drawings of the modifications have been provided by the contractor, and as-built drawings will be completed at a later date.  There was not time for the contractor to fabricate a gasket for the flanged joint, so one will be installed by TRIUMF at a later date and included in the as-built drawing package.

 The final panels of the partition wall were installed today as per drawing IRH1609.  Sealing, finishing, and painting of the NHC walls and floor can now commence.

 Lead gasket IRH1633 was installed today according to assembly drawing IRH1618 Rev B.

 The North Hot Cell shielding window gaskets have been changed and the window has been filled with new oil.  Although there was no noticeable oil leaks before starting the job, the gaskets had not been changed since initial installation approximately 15 years ago, so they were done now as part of construction of the new  cell.  The work took place between January 26 – Feb 8, 2017 following the attached PDF “Full procedure for NHC shielding window gasket change” which references “Gasket change procedure from Hot Cell Services” (also attached).

To drain the window a 1/2”polyethylene hose was attached to the drain line using  a Swagelok fitting and routed into a 55 gallon drum.  A vent valve on the expansion tank was opened to allow air to enter  the window.  It took approximately 5 hours to drain the window using this method.  Approximately 50 US gallons were drained from the window, agreeing with the amount specified on Hot Cell Services drawing #96173-100 (attached).

After draining, the window was purged with helium then pressurized to approximately 13” WC with helium.  A pressure drop of 0.6” WC was observed over a 2 hour period.  While pressurized, a Varian G8601-60001 leak detector was  used to sniff for helium around the perimeter of the gaskets on both the hot and cold  sides – no helium leaks detected.  A small leak was found on the pressure gauge used to monitor helium pressure.

The cold side cover panel assembly was  then removed  following the HCS procedure.  From HCS Drawing #96173-100, the weight  of the cold side glass cover panel was estimated to be  approximately 50lbs.  The guide  pins used were McMaster-Carr PN# 93460A385.  The trim frame could be easily removed, however the glass panel was stuck to the window housing.  A putty knife and isopropyl alcohol were used to cut through the gasket to separate the window from the housing.  The alcohol did not damage the paint of the housing – acetone was also tested on a small area and did not cause damage  to the paint.  Two suction cup handles were used to transport the glass panel, and it was easily lifted by two people.  Various methods were attempted to remove old gasket material and gasket adhesive  from the trim frame and housing surfaces – the most successful was using a razor blade scraper to remove the majority of the material, followed by an acetone wipe to remove the remainder of the stuck-on gasket adhesive.  The panel was reinstalled with new gaskets following the attached  procedures - no issues encountered.  After torqueing the trim frame bolts the window was leak checked as before.  A drop of 0.8” WC was observed over two hours, and no helium could be detected around  the perimeter of the new cold side gasket.

The hot side cover panel assembly was changed using the same method as for the cold side.  The glass panel was estimated to be 150lbs.  A small amount of oil (< 0.5 L) remained behind the hot side glass panel after draining which spilled out after removal of the glass. Four suction cup handles were used, and four people were required to remove and reinstall the panel.  After installation the leak check was repeated with a drop of 0.3” WC observed over two hours, and no helium detectable around the perimeter of the hot side gasket.

The replacement gaskets were ordered from Hot Cell Services under PO# 3033973 matching the material and sizes specified on  HCS drawing #96173-100.

The window was filled with Drakeol 10B LT MIN OIL NF, Product  code: PEN1550-00-C-DR, PO #3034657.  The window was filled by lifting the drum onto the walkway leading  to the target hall entrance, and siphoning the oil out of the drum with a 1/2” polyethylene tube connected to the drain fitting, and an air vent open on the expansion tank.  Oil was added until the expansion tank was approximately 80% full.

After filling was complete, the cold side housing was repainted using Macropoxy 646 epoxy paint, 4019 Flint Gray.  When the inside of the NHC is next accessible the hot side trim frame bolts will be re-painted to protect the bare metal exposed from removing and reinstalling them.

Note that a quote for $74,313 ($56,823 USD) (PDF attached) was received from Hot Cell Services for them to do this job.  We were able to  successfully complete this ourselves with approximately $4500 required for the gaskets, $200 for other materials, and roughly 8 FTE days of work.