HALCW O2 level sensor annual maintenance is done. sensor membrane has been changed and electrolyte has been refilled. gauge is calibrated. It works normal after the job.

Friday June 24 2011

The target module has been moved to the Conditioning Station (CS)

Pumping overnight

Saturday June 25 2011

Pressure Service Cap (SC) 3E-6 T

Pressure Containment Box (CB) 6.6E-6 T

High voltage test to 40 kV, unfortunately, the pressure is not great so we stop at 40 kV

Pressure at the end of the day: 1650H was, P SC 2.6E-6T

P CB 6.6E-6 T

Sunday June 26 2011

Pressure P SC 1.6E-6T

P CB 6.6E-6 T

It seems we have a leak. The pressure does not drop in the CB over one day.

Today June 27 2011

 Pressure P SC 1.2E-6T

P CB 6.6E-6 T

We leak check the target module and found two leaks, one on the ground electrode and one on the mounting plate cooling circuit.

This is a new one. We had test this line three times before and it was ok.

Action for tomorrow.

After CS vent, 

Move TM1 to SHC

Survey 

Connect LD to Mounting plate cooling circuit

Open Side panel and leak check.

Meeting at 0830H

Over the period of July 20-21st TM1 had several repairs completed and tested. The easiest of the repairs was the installation of a gasket and a blank off. The next repair was to replace the 2 oring on the side panels that were removed for inspection and repair. The instrument panel oring was replaced again and the previous one measured. Both were found to have the correct diameter of 0.131 inches for the seal groove. When attempting to cut the thermocouple line back to an acceptable distance it detached from the stainless tube running down the high voltage chase. It was discovered that it was only being held in place with heat shrink and that the bend consisted of a hand made copper tube that was flared slightly, a truly poor electrical and mechanical connection. Also discovered was the thermocouple wire was left in the tube, this too was removed. The stainless steel tube was then secured to the tube heater (C) lines with a PEEK tie wrap. The port where the thermocouple line was then blanked off. The extraction electrode and mounting plate feed through stem repair went as practiced and no unexpected events occurred. One thing of note is that because the lines are twisted and some of the tube was removed the quick connects are no longer facing the same direction they were before. During these repairs the Ion gauge screen contacted a filament and caused a fault, this was repaired by edi who rotated the gauge. Roughing was started at ~10 am on July 21st and the turbo pumps turned on at 10:45.  At 13:20 all of the lines and external seals were tested and no leaks were found. The module was at a pressure of 2.9 x 10^-5 Torr (IMG) and 1.4 x 10^-5 Torr (ION). The leak test cart was at a pressure of ~2.7 x 10^-2 Torr and a leak rate of 1.1 x 10^-2 atm cc/sec for the external leak test and the repaired lines. A small response was found in the Tube heater (D) where the leak increased to 2.1 x 10^-8 atm cc/sec. The leak test cart would then no longer drop below 1.9 x 10^-8 atm cc/sec and there was no response measured for lines C, B, and A. Over all very positive results! After 6 hours of pumping down the pressures were 2.0 X 10^-5 Torr (IMG) and 9.7 x 10^-6 Torr (Ion).  

Bevan Moss wrote:

Over the period of July 20-21st TM1 had several repairs completed and tested. The easiest of the repairs was the installation of a gasket and a blank off. The next repair was to replace the 2 oring on the side panels that were removed for inspection and repair. The instrument panel oring was replaced again and the previous one measured. Both were found to have the correct diameter of 0.131 inches for the seal groove. When attempting to cut the thermocouple line back to an acceptable distance it detached from the stainless tube running down the high voltage chase. It was discovered that it was only being held in place with heat shrink and that the bend consisted of a hand made copper tube that was flared slightly, a truly poor electrical and mechanical connection. Also discovered was the thermocouple wire was left in the tube, this too was removed. The stainless steel tube was then secured to the tube heater (C) lines with a PEEK tie wrap. The port where the thermocouple line was then blanked off. The extraction electrode and mounting plate feed through stem repair went as practiced and no unexpected events occurred. One thing of note is that because the lines are twisted and some of the tube was removed the quick connects are no longer facing the same direction they were before. During these repairs the Ion gauge screen contacted a filament and caused a fault, this was repaired by edi who rotated the gauge. Roughing was started at ~10 am on July 21st and the turbo pumps turned on at 10:45.  At 13:20 all of the lines and external seals were tested and no leaks were found. The module was at a pressure of 2.9 x 10^-5 Torr (IMG) and 1.4 x 10^-5 Torr (ION). The leak test cart was at a pressure of ~2.7 x 10^-2 Torr and a leak rate of 1.1 x 10^-2 atm cc/sec for the external leak test and the repaired lines. A small response was found in the Tube heater (D) where the leak increased to 2.1 x 10^-8 atm cc/sec. The leak test cart would then no longer drop below 1.9 x 10^-8 atm cc/sec and there was no response measured for lines C, B, and A. Over all very positive results! After 6 hours of pumping down the pressures were 2.0 X 10^-5 Torr (IMG) and 9.7 x 10^-6 Torr (Ion).

 I again checked the TM this morning (July 22) at 10:00 am (24 hours of pumping), There is no external leaks carts pressure was 0.0x10^-4 Torr and leak rate was 0.0X10^-9 atm cc/sec. The IMG gauge was reading 6.8 x 10^-6 Torr and ION gauge was reading 3.1 x 10^-6 Torr. The lowest we have yet to record on the IMG gauge was 6.6 x10^-6 Torr and that was when the ION gauge was reading 1.2 x 10^-6 Torr and there were several leaks. This is a very good sign. I will continue to check the vacuum throughout the day. 

One more thing of note is that the copper feed thru stems have a design flaw, the holes for the locating pins are too large. As such a custom step pin had to be made. It work functionally the same but is not as intended.

Tm#1 with Ta#37 moved from the south hot cell to the conditioning station. Move went well.

 TM1 has received the Ta#37-LP and has been pumping since thursday. This morning the pressure gauges read, IMG1: 1.6x10^-6 T and IG1: 7.4x10^-7 T.

The high voltage power supply has been connected to all high voltage feedthroughs and the voltage raise to 42 kV. 

High voltage conditioning started around 20 kV and after few minutes we were able to go up to 40 kV. 

The pressure increases on both locations, IG1 went up to 8.1x10^-7T and IMG1 went up to 1.8x10^-6T.

The module is good to go. 

 Pump down in the conditioning station started at ~2:40 for rough down. The turbo pumps were turned on at ~3:30 and at 3:52 the pressures were reading as follows:

IMG in the containment box 9.2 x 10^-5 T

IMG in the secondary 2.0 x 10^-3 T

ION in the service cap 4.6 x 10^-5 T

Note that the cross has been installed on the vacuum vessel which now includes a turbo pump and the IMG 100.

Leak check will occur tomorrow.

 A leak check was performed on the module when it was in the conditioning station today. There were no external leaks found. When the coolant lines were check a small leak was found in the heat shield circuit. Base leak rate was 6.7 x 10^-9 atm cc /sec and rose to 4.1 x 10^-9 atm cc /sec quickly (~3 seconds) and remained there for the 2 minute test. The remaining lines had small responses as usual but the highest response was in the low 10^-8 atm cc /sec range. The pressures were recorded as 1.2X10^-6 T, 2.7 x 10^-6 T and 1.1 10^-5 T in the service cap, containment box, and secondary respectively. The module was then vented with argon which took ~1.5 hours, vessel was pressurized to ~ 1 psi. A panel was then removed to leak check the feed through stem of the heat shield pressure of the line was recorded to be 0.0 x 10^-4 T and a leak rate of 1.3 x 10^-8 atm cc/sec was achieved. The stem was sprayed and no response was found. Swipes of the were taken of the panel (150 counts) and the containment box (3000 counts). The panel was then returned and the vessel roughed out for the weekend, it will be vented and moved to the south hot cell on Monday where the VCR fittings will be checked again and then tightened.  

Today a leak check on TM1's external seals and the heat shield line was completed by David Wang. After 16 hours of the turbo pumps running on the conditioning station stations pressures were 3.6 x 10^-6 T, 1.2 x 10^-5 T, and 1.8 x 10^-6 T for the containment box, secondary vacuum, and service cap respectively. This is a significantly quicker pump down after the cross with small turbo pump was installed on the vacuum vessel. The base pressure of the leak testing cart was 0.0 x 10^-4 T and the leak rate was 1.2 x 10 x 10^-8 atm cc / sec. There was no response from the external test where the module was sprayed with helium. The heat shield line was pressurized with 80 psi helium which caused the leak rate to climb to a maximum of 2.5 10 ^-8 atm cc / sec but dropped to 1.9 x 10^-8 atm cc / sec and was stable there, the total test time was 2 minutes. This test was repeated another time and had similar results.  These results although showing a slight increase in the detected leak rate are withing acceptable and indicate that the module is leak tight. 

At 9:30 the HV check and conditioning started (~17 hours turbos on), the secondary vacuum, containment box and service cap had the following pressures in Torr respectively, 1.0 x 10^-5, 3.2 x 10^-6, 1.6 x 10^-6.  The voltage was steadily raised with virtually no current up to 28.5 kV which was achieved at 9:50. When raised to 30 kV the current increased significantly to ~300 uA and a large amount of sparking occurred. The voltage was dropped to 0 volts for 2 minutes and then was returned to 30 kV at 10:03, the current draw was around 200 uA and climbing. After a few sparks and time the current had dropped to 120 uA. This indicates that the module is still conditioning and matches what is observed by the control room when the module is in ITW. The module was deemed acceptable for this current run and was then vented with argon this took about 2 hours.

The module was then remotely moved from the conditioning station to ITW. When first attempting to transfer the controls to the remote control room they were not transferred and when testing the up command as per standard procedure the module dropped down slightly. David Wang went to lock out the target again and the controls were successfully transferred. A note of this was made in the log book. Apart from this the move went smoothly.  

Roughing on TM1 started at ~15:00 today by ~16:30 the module had reached a pressure of ~200 mTorr and the turbo pumps were turned on. TP1 failed to achieve normal operation and we running at approximately 4KRPM and 50W with 6.1 A of current draw. TP2 was able to achieve normal operation. The controller for TP1 was then powered off and back on but that failed to resolve the issue. The controllers for TP1 & 2 were then switched at which point TP1 again failed normal operation and TP2 achieved it, thus eliminating the controller as the issue. The turbo pumps have been turned off and the roughing pump left on for overnight in case Vacuum group wishes to do any additional diagnosis. 

TM#4 moved from conditioning station to south hot cell. For further leak checking.

A leak check was performed on the module on October 27/10/2011 by David Wang and was reported to Bevan Moss but it never made it into the Elog system. This entry is to summarize the results of that testing. All circuits were pressurized to 80 psi with helium and every line except the tube heater (+) showed no or small responses as experienced before. The tube heater line had a slightly larger response under the conditions summarized below:

Varian 959

Base Pressure                   7.0 x 10^-3 Torr

Base Leak Rate                  7.5 x 10^-9 atm cc/sec

Gauges

IG1                                         2.0 x 10^-6 Torr

PNG5                                    9.6 x 10^-6 Torr

PNG4 (C.S.)                        2.4 x 10^-5 Torr

Convectron (Back line) 20mTorr

 The leak rate quickly climbed to 3.0 x 10^-8 atm cc/sec then constantly climbed to 1.4 x 10^-7 atm cc/sec for 2 minutes. David repeated this test again at the end of the leak test and found the same results. In the past we have called this a leak and attempted to find its location and repair it. David believes that this isn’t a real leak as we have been able to achieve very good vacuum on TM4 all year and that we do not normally touch the feed through stem on this circuit. This result makes me nervous as the total differential is roughly the same as that we found on the UCx#2 run(which was at a higher vacuum).

The result of this test caused the module to move back to the hot cell for further more localized leak checking.

 I did a leak check again on TM4 today. This time, the leak detector pump to the bottom on both base pressure(0.0xE-4 torr) and base leak rate(0.0xE-9 atm.cc/sec). All high vacuum gauges on TM4 and conditioning station at -6torr range.IG1 is 3.3-6torr,PNG5(top of service cap)is 6.5-6 torr, and the PNG4(bottom of the vessel )is 8.7-6torr. For air to vacuum leak checking, I checked the panel we moved last week on service cap by spraying helium around the panel. There is no any response on leak detector. The panel is leak tight. Also I sprayed helium around the tube heater (+) water cap and blue nylon stand. They are also leak tight. Then, I put 80 psi pressure air to the “D” circuit first. With 80 psi pressure air for 5 minutes, the leak detector has no any response on it. Also all high vacuum gauges stayed at same level .Then I checked it with 80 psi pressure helium for 3 minutes. The leak detector has a response on leak rate with pressure helium same as last time. It climbed from the 0.0xE-9 atm. cc/sec quickly to high -8 range then slow down. The leak rate finally climbed to 2.0 X E-7 atm.cc/sec this time. There is no base pressure change on leak detector. All high vacuum gauge readings no change during the test time. There is a small helium leak at 80 psi pressure test on “D” circuit. But we can not locate it at this stage. Also I don’t want to disturb this circuit any more before the febiad run since this time I saw a little bit increase on leak rate comparing to last time when I checked it. If we really like to find this small helium leak, I would suggest we do it after the febiad run.    Thank you.

 The silicon carbide targets voltage was raised to 42 kV today before continuous current draw was observed. It took roughly 10 minutes to raise the module to this voltage with only the occasional spark. The ION gauge reading was 2.0 x 10^-6 T, The service cap IMG 3.6 x 10^-6 T, and the secondary vacuum was 4.5 x 10^-6 T. Setup check and conditioning was performed by Pierre.

TM#4 with SiC#26 HP move from the conditioning station to the East Target Station, move went well.

TM#1 has been moved from the south hot cell to the conditioning station. Move went well.

TM#1 moved from the conditioning station to the south hot cell. Move went well.

TM#1 with UCx#3 has been moved from the south hot cell to the conditioning station. Move went well.

 TM1 was high voltage tested without a target on November 16, 2011 with Don Jackson, Pierre Bricault, and Bevan Moss. The module was able to hold up to 25 kV but between that and 32 kV there was lots of discharge which could be measured in the vacuum. See the attached plot for the voltage current and sparks.

TM1 full leak check in conditioning station has been fulfilled this morning.Both air to vacuum leak check and waterlines helium 80psi pressure test are fine.The result:

Air to vacuum helium spray:base leak rate on leak detector 1.6x E-9 atm .cc/sec.base pressure0.0xE-4 torr. sprayed helium around all flanges, turbo pumps,panels,bellow,insulation stands, gauges. No Response on leak detector. Air to vacuum seals on TM1 is leak tight.

Helium pressure test on all water lines.with 80 psi helium 3minutes test:

        PNG1 :2.4XE-7torr .PNG4 :2.6x E-6torr . IG1 :5.1xE-7torr.

A :target oven(+)  BL:2.0xE-9 atm.cc/sec .First minute no response,then climbed to1.9xE-8 atm.cc/sec. Stabled at 1.9xE-8 atm.cc/sec to 3 minutes.

B:target oven(-)    BL:5.5x E-9 atm.cc/sec.First 80 seconds no response, then climbed to 1.8xE-8atm.cc/sec. Stabled at 1.8xE-8atm.cc/sec to 3 minutes.

C:tube heater(-)   BL:8.0xE-9 atm.cc/sec .First minute no response ,then climbed to 2.7xE-8 atm.cc/sec. Stabled at 2.7x E-8 atm.cc /sec to 3 minutes.

D: tube heater(+) BL: 1.0xE-8 atm.cc/sec. First minute no response , then climbed to 1.8xE-8 atm.cc/sec. Stabled at 1.8x E-8 atm.cc/sec to 3minutes.

G:EE  BL:1.0xE-8 atm.cc/sec .First 1.5 minutes no response , then climbed to 1.7x E-8 atm.cc/sec. Stabled at 1.7x E-8atm.cc/sec to 3minutes.

F:heat shield   BL:1.2x E-8 atm.cc/sec. First  1.5 minutes no response , then climbed to 1.9 xE-8 atm.cc/sec. Stabled at 1.9 xE-8 atm.cc/sec to 4 minutes. Total test time 4 minutes.

I: mounting plate    BL:1.2 x E-8 atm.cc/sec.     NO RESPONSE on leak detector  in 3minutes.

M: window   BL:1.2x E-8 atm.cc/sec First 1.5 minutes  no response,then climbed to 2.0xE-8 atm.cc/sec . Stabled at 2.0xE-8 atm.cc/sec to 3minutes.

The base pressure on leak detector stayed at 0.0x E-9 torr through all the test, and no pressure response on high vacuum gauges.