The following tasks were completed:

1. Yesterday (Jan 18), the T1/T2 cooling packages were inspected for leaks and some moisture was found underneath the CUNO filters behind the resin cans on both T1/T2. It was determined that the source of the leak was a loose fitting on the drain valves of the CUNO filter housing (see photo). Today we confirmed that no more moisture is found underneath the CUNO filter after these fittings were tightened. A note will be made to keep this in mind for future shutdown operations.
2. The shaft couplings on the T1/T2 target ladder drive system were inspected: no cracks were identified on the rubber couplings.
3. Actuation of the T1/T2 profile monitors were tested. Vacuum levels at T1/T2 remained stable throughout (see picture).
4. The pneumatic connections/hose/fittings for the T1/T2 profile monitors, and M9/M20 BB were inspected - therere were some air leaks out from the ASCO valve + pneumatic flow control valve on the T2 profile monitor when it was in the down/out position. The same leak out of the pneumatic valve by the profile monitor connection was found at T1. Given that both profile monitors actuated properly however, these leaks were determined to not be an issue.

Next week, we will continue work by actuating the M9/M20 BB at T2, at which point this ELOG will be updated.

UPDATE Jan 30, 2024: The M9 and M20 beam blockers were tested, no leaks through the tubing were observed, actuation was quick, ops confirmed no perceptible change in 1A vacuum levels during actuation and EPICS reads correct blocker position signals.

Note: the M20 blocker was actuated by ops, while the M9/T2 blocker was actuated using the ASU on the B2 level of the Meson Hall. The ASU did not require the area to be blocked off to actuate the T2 blocker.

------------------------------------

Note: Ops noted that the profile monitor interlock status has to be reset if a timeout is encountered (such as if the pump were to be turned off or a trip was encountered) before the profile monitor can be actuated (see picture).

Note: When inspecting the system, we tried to open the rotary collimator air supply and the handle on the pannel mounted valve broke off (like it did for the T2 valve last shutdown - see picture). 

UPDATE Jan 30, 2024: The handle to the rotary collimator air supply valve was replaced (see image).

Note: There was also some small leaks at the hose clamps at the T2 profile monitor, in the out position. This leak was however smaller than the leak through the valve. 

On May 23, 2024 two sets of plugs from position 1 and 3 and a 12mm Be target from position 5 (serial #109) was removed from T1-MK1 in the Meson Hall remote handling hot cell.

The plugs and spent target are kept in the secondary hot cell (East) on the lift table for future beamspot imaging and to cool down prior to disposal.

In their place 12mm Be targets were placed:

• #107 in position 5
• #110 in position 3
• #111 in position 1

We will continue with leak checking and position measurements in the coming week, at which point this ELOG will be updated.

------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE May 24:

• leak testing began on the T1-MK1, vacuum stagnated at 1.5e-2 Torr and a leak rate of 3.9e-07 atm-cc/sec (system vented, will re-tighten target fittings and re-do leak test). 
• after tightening and repeating pump-down in the afternoon, the vacuum volume stalled again at 1.5e-2 Torr. releasing helium to the target fittings registered a response in the leak tester at all virtually locations (for either side of the ladder). 
• the plan for the coming monday is to re-check the vacuum fittings and re-tighten the swage-lok connections to the targets before repeating the leak test once more.

------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE May 27:

• the swage fittings for the targets on position 1,3,5 were tightened in the morning but the volume still couldn't be pumped down to 1e-03 Torr.
• pumping down only on the vacuum line (up to KF elbow ahead of hansen fitting at outlet of target connections pannel) allowed the pressure to drop to 1e-03 Torr so it was determined that the leak tester + associated vacuum connections were not the problem.
• shortly afterwards, we troubleshooted by pumping only to the 'high pressure test' setting (no Turbo pump) and sprayed helium to various joints above the target flange. we learned that there is likely some leaking through the hansen fittings + the swage elbow from the fittings down through the target flange.
• plastic ferrules are used in this elbow to allow for some seals to be replaced, so this may be the source of the leak.
• then, the fittings on the target ladder were re-tightened and helium was sprayed onto various fittings on the ladder. all but the left join on target ladder #1 (position 9a) does not register a leak rate above baseline after tightening.
• at end of day, the ladder was able to consistently reach a base-line leak rate of 1.7e-07 Torr-l/sec and a vacuum of 4e-3 Torr.
• we will proceed with replacing the water line connections on top of the target flange and re-check the leak-tightness of the ladder in the coming days.

------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE June 14:

several attempts at replacing the plastic (Nylon, Swage NY-1013-1 and NY-1014-1) ferrules and re-establishing the fittings on the target service panel were made since the last update. it was determined that the lines leading from the leak detector to the target panel was leak tight (reached 1e-03 Torr within ~5 minutes of pumping down). a double-male Hansen adapter was made to test this (see image). in the final attempt to re-seal, the nylon ferrul-ed fittings were tightened last and the target managed to pump down to 2e-03 Torr, with a stable baseline leak rate of ~2e-08 Torr-L/s. note that prior to exchanging targets, the leak rate obtained during water flushing was 1e-10 Torr-L/sec. additionally, spraying helium on the inlet fittings still registered a response at the leak detector (~4e-6 Torr-L/sec in the worst case).

we think that the following happened to the target, leading to the leak: at some point the target panel collided with something by the water outlet hansen port (see image), this caused the nylon ferrule at that line to crack/become damaged but no leaks occurred immediately after. when we performed the target exchange, the water line was disturbed in some way either as a result of torque-ing the target fittings or when the ladder was moved on the turntable causing the joint to completely fail and leak. because of the damage from the collision, after taking the fittings apart, it is no longer possible to return the fittings and for them to seal.

the plan moving forward is to implement some minor design changes to 1) replace the damaged fittings on the target panel, 2) better facilitate replacement of the nylon ferrules in the future, 3) better facilitate leak testing on the target service panel connections.

------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Sep 27:

• After designing, releasing, and procuring the leak fix components (see TRH1681), we implemented changes to the electrical barrel connectors and tested the fit of the cooling line piping (see pictures).
• We checked that the ladder motor, potentiometer, and limit switch circuits all worked properly.
• Some differences were noted:
  • D10414-2 accepts 1/4"-20 screws to mount the panel, not 10-24 like shown in the legacy drawings, the clearance hole on TRH1682 had to be adjusted accordingly.
  • The low profile screws specified for the barrel connectors were difficult to use (item 108 in TRH1681), so instead we used normal 4-40 socket head cap screws and were able to check that the barrel connectors could fully couple without interference from the socket head.
  • We did not use lock washers for the barrel connector flanges because they drop too easily and instead we elected to tighten the nuts well.
  • Some loose leads fell out of the potentiometer (bottom left) and profile monitor (bottom right) barrel connectors. These were not electrically connected to anything so we decided to remove them, they will be kept in a recorded location at the end of the operation. 
• In the coming week, we will look to fasten the water line fully and check that they are leak tight.

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Oct 02:

• The water line was fastened fully, some items noted:
  • Order of fittings tightened: elbow to bulkhead adapter > elbow to reducer > 5/8" connector to tube > elbow with reducer to tube > nylon ferrule connection
  • We tried to tighten the elbow with reducer to the tubes with the tubes in position to minimize loading the nylon ferrule at the end but found that the outlet tube still ended up protruding significantly from the bulkhead plate (see image). For future operations we should make a note to not load the outlet tube too significantly because it is only supported by the tube (bulkhead nut not fully engaged).
  • The above issue likely resulted from bending the tubes to the 3D printed template but yielding misaligned ends. In the future better templates that emphasize absolute end alignment for tube bending should be made
  • The NPT-Hansen nipple was not tightened before the water line was put on which may have applied unnecessary loads onto the tubes. In the future we will make a note in the drawing on which fittings to tighten first and how to perform the operation to minimize loading on the nylon ferrules
  • In the future some modifications can be made to help relieve this issue for version 2 of the water connections, maybe using flexible metal tubes or thinner walled pipe, alternatively we can implement a more flexible mounting approach for the Hansen ends.
• We noted some tight clearances on the electrical bulkhead. In future implementations of the fix, the connectors can be spaced farther apart or staggered, also they should be moved further down from the top flange of the target ladder.
• Leak testing proceeded with the following results:
  • Total time under vacuum ~2 hours
  • Reached 'fine' vacuum within 1 minute, pressure saturated to 2e-3 Torr within 3 mins 30 secs.
  • Baseline leak rate of 0.0e-10 Torr-L/s reached within 7 minutes of pumping down.
  • ~1.4e-9 Torr-L/s peak @ 15s delay (to first signal) after 1s x 3psi He to general vicinity of newly made water line connections << deemed acceptable
  • 0.5s x 3 psi bursts of He
    • ~0.9e-09 Torr-L/s peak @ 15s delay to nylon ferrule outlet line (did not change after further tightening) < deemed acceptable
    • ~0.2e-10 Torr-L/s peak @ 15s delay to nylon ferrule inlet line < deemed acceptable
    • ~0.5e-10 Torr-L/s peak @ 40s delay to NPT-Hansen outlet < deemed acceptable
    • ~0.4e-10 Torr-L/s peak @ 40s delay to NPT-Hansen inlet < deemed acceptable
  • SS swagelok connections not tested thoroughly due to low likelihood of being a leak source (all tightened properly to 1.25 turns as per swagelok directions)
  • He 'bleed' test by closing hot-cell He wand solenoid valve and bringing wand opening ~5 cm from pos.5 target swagelok resulted in a stable leak rate of 0.8e-8 Torr-L/s << target ladder leak likely prevents pressure in target ladder from bottoming out.
• Will carry on with leak testing the target ladder and possibly the swagelok fittings on top of the hot cell if necessary by the end of the week.

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Oct 04:

• The target ladder was pumped down at ~11 am and reached the same baseline as yesterday (0e-10 Torr-L/s @ 2e-3 Torr within 3mins, 30 sec), but in the afternoon, the baseline leak rate worsened to 1.0e-8 Torr-L/s.
• For reference, 0.5s of 3psi He was delivered to the water outlet nylon ferrule joint and registered a response of 1.8e-8 Torr-L/s with a delay of 20 sec. A 3s spray at 3 psi around the water fittings registered a 4.9e-8 Torr-L/s response with a 15s delay.
• The following was observed from sending 0.5s of He to the target ladder Swagelok fittings (see Img for more details):
  • Leak rate baseline improved during testing (~over 1 hour) to 3.0e-9 Torr-L/s
  • Bellows, and targets 2-5 registered leak rates in the order of 1e-8 Torr-L/s
  • Target 1's left Swagelok fitting registered the highest leak rate at 2.8e-7 Torr-L/s (when the leak rate baseline would have dropped to the lowest value of 3.0e-9 Torr-L/s)
• We checked the KF and hansen fittings to make sure that they are not a leak source and managed to bottom out on both the leak rate and pressure readings on the leak tester.
• We will take off Target 1 in the next session, run a die over the male threads, clean the conical face of the male thread with scotchbrite,and attempt to re-do the target joint before leak testing once more.

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Oct 11:

• We removed target at pos 1 (ID 111), noticing that the swagelok nuts were easy to undo.
• Working theories on how they became 'loose' include: 1) creep undoing misalignment between the two swagelok tubes on target, 2) vibration from the nuclear ventilation onto the target ladder undoing the joint, 3) thermal changes between summer and 'fall'.
• The threads on pos1 seem worn, it may be a good idea to plug this ladder position permanently to avoid further damaging the threads and jeopardizing the ladder in the future (see image).
• The ferrules on the target seem to be in good condition but we should still clean them with the scotch brite tool
• We added plugs over the exposed male swagelok ports to protect from debris entering the water line.
• We placed the removed target between two wypalls and weighed the wypall down with a wrench to protect it from debris.
• The 3D printed scotch brite tools need to be re-designed for 3/8" drive size (was designed for 1/2" drives).
• We will return to bag, and package the target for safe keeping in the secondary hot cell; clean the male swagelok threads and sealing faces on pos 1 target ladder; and possibly place permanent plugs in pos 1.

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Oct 15:

• The leak tester was calibrated with an external calibrator. Original leak rate 1.3e-7 Torr-L/s, 2% loss over ~10 years >> ~1.1 Torr-L/s leak rate.
• The leak checker registered an initial leak rate of ~2.3 Torr-L/s before calibration so we corrected the measurement (at least within the calibration range) by a factor of 2.
• This voids old leak testing data that we made on the target ladder.
• We will add a note to the procedure to ensure that the leak detector has been calibrated before performing leak testing in the future

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Oct 23:

• After some testing with 3/8" tube Swagelok threads outside of the hot cell, we determined that the reason the threads in pos 1 of the target ladder was 'difficult' to run was likely because the nuts were over-tightened previously.
• There is a risk of compromising the threads if we run the die over over-tightened threads because they have been shifted from where they should be. We will instead attempt to replace the plugs, after cleaning the sealing face on the male threads using the cleaning tools.
• We also checked with a Swagelok tightening gage (3/8) to see whether the other targets were tightened properly, and all had gaps smaller than the gage. Note that we could not get fully into the gap with the gage on the side by the profile/protect monitor due to interference with a support column with the gripper. We will make an extender tool to avoid this issue in the future.
• We also bagged the target that was previously mounted onto pos 1 on the ladder and moved it to the secondary hot cell for storage (temporary).

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Oct 24:

• The threads and sealing face on pos 1 were cleaned with scotch brite, blown with compressed air from the inside by connecting compressed air line at the service panel, blown with compressed air from a bottle externally, and wiped with a wypall with the manipulators.
• The old plugs were moved to the secondary hot cell, new plugs were tightened onto pos 1.
• Initially the baseline leak rate was 3.3e-8 Torr-l/s at 4e-3 Torr. With He, we were able to determine that the plugs, specifically position 9a, was the most leaky joint in the ladder.
• After a couple rounds of tightening the plugs, and making sure that the remaining targets were also tight, the baseline improved to 1.7e-9 Torr-l/sec. The plug at position 9a also no longer registered a leak response from having the He line brought up to the joint.
• The plug at position 9a still is the leakiest location in the ladder however, registering a peak leak rate of 2e-8 Torr-l/s at the final baseline.
• We deem that the ladder is sufficiently leak tight, and we will move on to replacing a rubber coupling on top of the target ladder before performing target position measurements.

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Nov 25:

• The coupler was successfully removed with a custom puller tool (see TRH1730, TRH1731, TRH1732, and Document-244878). This tool is used for the 3/8" shaft side.
• The press fit coupler had to be cut up with a dremel and saw before using the tool.
• The old coupler had to be 'cut-up' to be removed. During initial troubleshooting, the rubber body split, indicating that it was near end of life.
• The replacement coupler system could be inserted without removing any parts.
• The relative alignment of the shafts may have changed up to 1/2 a turn during this process (the printed clamps were not strong enough to resist torques exerted when attempting to remove the press fit coupler).
• Potentiometer table will need to be reviewed when performing target measurements.
• Light loctite to be added to the treads.
• Note: the old coupler has stainless shaft adapter (3/8" step down).

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Nov 28:

• Loctite added to all coupler screws (including flexible coupling from motor to three-way gearbox)
• Final leak check completed on replacement piping on service panel with the following results
  • baseline leak rate bottomed to 0.0e-10 Torr-L/sec within 7 mins and pressure bottomed to 1e-3 Torr within 5 mins.
  • baseline leak rate worsened to around 1e-9 Torr-L/sec by the end of leak testing, assumed due to increase in amount of trapped He in the line through testing
  • (time to detect [s] || peak leak rate [Torr-L/sec]) values for 3psi, 0.5s Helium using wand on top of hot cell
    • inlet side:
      • 20s || 3.8e-10 for nylon ferrule joint
      • 20s || 6.3e-10 for o-ring flange
      • 20s || 2.7e-10 for hansen NPT thread
    • outlet side:
      • 15s || 3.5e-10 for plastic ferrule joint
      • 15s || 5.1e-10 for o-ring flange
      • 20s || 0.8e-9 for hansen NPT thread

The target ladder was moved to the lift table in preparation for measurements.

 ------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE Jan 03, 2025:

• Measurements (elevations) of the targets and alignment jig were completed over December to early January.
• Notes on measurement procedure:
  • Used the old alignment jig instead of new (easier to insert/remove)
  • Noticed that the target ladder potentiometer is jumpy at around 12 kOhm
  • Placed the jig between positions 4-5 throughout (pot reading of 11.65 kOhm places the jig in beam height - in line with protect monitor)
  • For left-right measurements, moved the alignment jig 'into-position' (i.e. set potentiometer value to 11.65 kOhm) to 'zero' the micrometer before changing ladder position (potentiometer value) back to the target being measured (turntable height not touched after zero-ing off to the jig)
    • For the entry side, because the protect monitor is obstructing, target 5 had to be measured above the protect monitor (jig also zeroed off above the protect monitor, i.e. not at the resistance value given above), while all other targets were measured below.
    • This introduces some error since we are measuring the target not in the beam position.
  • Target height measurements were done with measuring tape as normal.
  • Targets were measured with turntable flange having an angle of ~0.2 degrees, plumb bob and jig measurements taken with turntable flange 'leveled' as best as possible (angle of ~0.02 degrees)
    • For future measurements, the turntable should be also leveled before target measurements.
  • Levelling the turntable flange was done with a Digi-pass digital level (DW-1300XY, in absolute level mode, calibrated before starting)
  • By the cutout, the turntable flange is less stiff, causing level measurements to be tilted inward. We therefore relied more on level measurements on solid portions of the turntable flange as well as on the target flange.
  • Levelling bolts could be turned with target ladder seated.
  • If the turntable is not rotated, and only raised/lowered, the levelness of the table and target remained approximately constant (e.g. from 0.02 degrees change to 0.04 degrees as the turntable is lowered fully from fully raised).
  • If rotated, the turntable level changes significantly (e.g. from 0.02 degrees to 0.15 degrees)
  • The flange was re-levelled between entry side and exit side measurements for the plumb bob and alignment jig measurements
  • With new nuclear ventilation filters, flow inside the hot cell perturbs the plumb bobs and prevents them from settling.
  • Nuclear ventilation had to be turned off momentarily for the plumb bob measurements
  • Nuclear ventilation is returned when working on the hot cell roof
  • Nuclear ventilation is controlled by turning the toggle on the electrical disconnect panel from 'hand' to 'off' ('auto' setting assumed not used)
  • Respirator and lab coat worn throughout plumb bob measurement job, air survey done by RPG after job (confirmed OK)
  • Area also 'taped off' during plumb bob measurements to prevent non-worker entry
• The coupler exchange resulted in around a 0.4mm shift in the target heights
• A shoulder screw and wood clamp is used to lock the plumb bob jig in place (old screw/nut missing, no other components in toolbox provides locating fit for pivot joint on jig)
• Assumed new plumb bob measurements more accurate due to better/more accurate 'levelling' equipment (digital level).

T1-MK1 electrical checks were completed on the hot cell. Specifically the profile and protect monitors were checked (assistance from Micheal Donohoe and Holden Jones from 'probes group'/accelerator systems).

Reference WP C2024-10-30-3.

"WORK INSTRUCTIONS / REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Perform blip test of target protect module by attaching HV oscillator to protect HV bias. Check that the oscillator signal is readable from U,D, L, R and HALO signal cables.

For profile monitor, connect PM cable assembly to 0518 MWC module in portable NIM crate. Connect 0518 "START" to ch2 of an oscilloscope and "ANALOG" to ch1. Set scope to trigger on Ch2. Connect HV oscillator to profile HV bias. Observe signals on all channel devisions, note any channels not responding."

----------------------------------------

Test outcome (paraphrased from text discussion with Micheal Donohoe)

Profile monitor functioning properly from test, but right 'plate' on protect monitor yielded different results to other plates. May need to be re-checked, pending comparisons with results from previous tests (issues with this because "different oscillator was used"). We may have also not used couplings for cables that were correct for that particular protect monitor plate.

----------------------------------------

In images attached, red cable used for profile monitor (connect to the vertical connector at the rear), the dark green wire is used to ground the system when the profile monitor is being checked. The grey cable bundle (with 'box') is used to check the protect monitor, with vertical pins located by the main lifting flange support bars in the front left of the target (see bottom right of first image).

----------------------------------------

Micheal and Holden returned on the 31st with Thomas Manson, they performed direct testing on the leads of the protect monitor connector (directly hook up leads on protect monitor connector to oscilloscope/multi-meter). All direct checks went well, the waveform issue from yesterday's testing likely resulted from the testing cable having issues.

Electrical testing on T1-MK1 is now complete. Probes group will work to update their documentation and possibly develop a process change to fabricate new cables to make the testing happen fully on the hot cell roof and have it complete faster.

Note: it may be a good idea to perform preventative maintenance on the protect monitor @ T1-MK1 the next time it is on the hot cell. Probes group members noted that the protect monitor components are nearing their end-of-life and it would be good to replace old components to avoid the protect monitor failing in the target station.

On Friday August 8th Ron Kuramoto observed that the Meson Hall air amplifier cycle speed had increased.  Cycle time measurements were taken on Monday August 11th.  The lower amplifier was found to be cycling 17 times per minute, and the upper air amplifier 16 times per minute (approximately 4s cycle period).  The cycle period for both amplifiers was measured in June 2012 and found to be approximately 25s.  Note that a cycle is defined as the time between air exhaust events (this may actually only be 1/2 of a full cycle of the amplifier mechanism).  Both amplifiers were delivering air pressure approximately 134psi during the test.

The upper air amplifier was rebuilt in 2012 and has not been used since.  This test shows that the amplifiers are performing normally and that the increased cycle speed is due to a leak elsewhere in the system.  The location of the air leak will be investigated further on maintenance days or during the September mini shutdown.  The exhaust pipes of the amplifier assembly were warm to the touch due to the increased cycle speed, but not excessively so, and the current cycle speed is not thought to be of immediate concern.

The lower amplifier was left running and the exhaust pressure was turned down to 125psi to slightly reduce the cycle speed (it is not thought to be necessary to have air pressure above 120psi)

 During the maintenance day today, amplified air to the T1 area was valved off in an attempt to pin point the location of the air leak.  The air amplifier cycle rate returned to normal with the T1 line valved off, indicating the leak is somewhere on the T1 profile monitor air cylinders, the T1 septum polarity switch, or on the supply lines to these devices.  Because these devices will not be used in the near future, the line will be left valved off.  Eric Chapman has applied a defeat tag to the valve and made an entry on the Cyclotron Logbook.

The cause of the leak will be investigated further during the 2014 Fall Mini-Shutdown

While the 1A blocks over the T1 area were removed last week the opportunity was used to investigate an air leak on the amplified air system discovered on August 11, 2014.

The leak was found to be coming from a device related to the septum polarity switch located behind (south of) the septum power supply on the 1A blocks.  This device is not in use, so the amplified air to the device was disconnected by plugging the relevant branch of a brass 3/8" Swagelok T fitting in the area.  This stopped the leak, and the air amplifier is cycling at usual speed after being restarted.

The BL1A amplified air system has been shut off, and will remain off until required for BL1A start-up in Spring 2015 (the lower of the two units was in use, with the upper unit on standby as a spare).

The active item discovered on January 9, 2015 outside the BL1A bootbox has been moved to the Meson Hall east hot cell for storage.  The item was analyzed by RPG and the radiation was found to be coming from activated metal contained by dried paint in the bottom of a plastic container.  The solidified paint puck was removed from the container which is not active.  The item is approximately 20microSv/hr at 0.5m, and 1.3mSv/hr on contact.

- T2 Protect Monitor moved from the beam line to the hot cell on Monday April 20th
- Elevation of the plate center measured at 1839.0mm from the base of the vacuum flange
- Old monitor cassette photographed (attached).  Heat mark noticed on exit side approximately 10mm above and 5mm south of plate centers (cause unknown, and no matching mark on entrance side)
- Old monitor cassette removed, new one installed.  New elevation 1836.1mm (2.9mm upward shift - 3.0mm was requested)
- Electrical check performed by Probes Group on April 22 - They reported that it looks normal
- T2 Protect Monitor returned to the beamline April 22 in the evening.  Cables plugged in and flange bolts installed
- Vacuum pumped down normally on April 23 in the morning
- Probes group repeated the electrical check after installation from the 1A mezzanine - They reported that it looks normal
- The old monitor cassette will be left in the hot cell for possible future use

The Meson Hall RH Lab Warm Cell was used by Beamlines Group for hydrostatic testing of the TNF heat exchanger.  The location was chosen because of access to a water supply, active drain, and the heat exchanger has removable contamination.  The work took place on April 30th and May 1, 2015.  New plastic sheet was placed over the 6 foot block in the center of the warm cell which was used as a work area.  The plastic was removed after completion of the job.  The floor around the block was swiped and 100cpm contamination was found.

See attached photos.

Replacement of the BL1A blocks was completed yesterday (May 8, 2015) in preparation for first beam down 1A on May 12th.  The attached PDF shows a photograph of the current arrangement, and also the block arrangement at the beginning of the 2014 running period for comparison.

 The water in the BL1A holding tank was released to the city sewer.  This water was sampled, tested, and approved for release by RPG two weeks ago.  The total volume was 510L, a combination of water from the T2 and TNF systems.  The total time required to pump out the water with all valves fully open was 1hr2m.  Paperwork for the water release was completed and returned to RPG.

The 4" Marman flange clamp (IRH0001) labeled "Clamp A",  as used in the testing detailed in Document-114623 Release 1, has been disassembled.  The parts were used to build a TRH1257 clamp which uses the new TRH1259 jaw with 0.480" jaw root width.  This new clamp has been labeled "TRH1257-#01", and will be tested with Helicoflex H-303654 seals in the near future.

The following tasks were completed over the past 2 weeks:

- Aquarium Technology Ltd. (UK) was contacted regarding best method for replacing window seal.  A detailed procedure was provided (attached below)
- The warm cell windows were determined to be acrylic, not glass.  Estimated weight: 450lb per panel

- All water in the warm cell windows was released to grassy area outside the lab after approval from Gord Wood (OH&S) and Joe Mildenberger (RPG)
- Warm cell was cleaned up and blocks were configured to make fields as low as possible in the work area around the windows (~2micro Sv/hr max field around windows).  No contamination found on warm cell floor.
- The old seal around each window was cut mechanically with a thin blade
- The panel spacer rods were removed  (most were constructed of SS and Al, however a couple were mild steel and were badly corroded)
- The window panels were separated from the frame using a rubber mallet and moved to the center of the tank (the panels were not removed from the tanks for this repair)
- The old seal material was removed from the panels and the aluminum frame using WD40 or mineral spirits to help break it down (this was a very tedious and unpleasant task)
- Pitting due to corrosion was found in various places on the aluminum frame.  It appeared to be worst where mild steel spacer rods were used, and also worse at weld locations (see attached photo).  Max depth of pits ~1/8"
- The corrosion was cleaned as much as possible using a wire brush then rags with mineral spirits
- A final clean of sealing surfaces was done with isopropyl alcohol
- A deep pit (~1/4" deep) was found on the inside of the inside of the aluminum frame on the west tank, south window (see attached photo)
- This pit, as well as some other smaller ones on the same side were filled with Dow Corning 791 sealant material

- Rubber stand-offs (Digi-Key #SJ5009-0-ND) were installed on the frame side in the center of the sealing faces (3 top, 3 bottom)
- The panels were moved back into place resting on 3/8" thick aluminum spacers (see attached photo).  These replaced spacers of the same size and material that were slightly corroded

The following tasks remain to be completed:

- Install panel spacer rods (mild steel rods to be replaced with SS or Al)
- Apply sealant to all panels from outside the tank as detailed in the procedure using 20oz pneumatic applicator caulk gun (PO: TR206556)
- Install corrosion inhibiting pads inside tank.  Will use 6 pads per tank, (4x McMaster 3609K2 & 2x McMaster 3590K2 per tank)
- Perform final clean of inside of windows and tank
- After 14 days cure time fill tanks with city water and allow to sit to check for leaks
- If leak tight, use water in tanks to back-flush the sand filter
- Refill tanks and start pump with filter in normal mode
- Occasionally check for water leaks and check status of pitting inside tank over the coming months/years
- Also monitor corrosion inhibiting pads and replace or change materials if necessary

Summarized Seal Replacement Procedure provided by Aquarium Technology Ltd:

1) Cut out the viewing panel entirely and mechanically clean all sealant traces from both the panel and the frame bearing faces of the tank structure

2) Degrease all sealing surfaces with something like pure petroleum spirit (mineral spirit) which won't harm the acrylic

3) Reinstall the clean viewing panel spacing it off the frame bearing face by around 10mm using self adhesive rubber stand-offs  (depending on panel flatness likely no more than 3 needed along the top and bottom)

4) Brace the panel in place, mask off the frame and panel, and then inject Dow Corning 791 sealant from the outside.  Ensure that the sealant goes in under pressure, fully wets both surfaces, and completely fills the void.

5) Allow the sealant to cure for 10-14 days before filling the tanks

 The T2 protect monitor cassette removed in April 2015 (see E-log #154) was surveyed today.  It was approximately 3mSv/hr at 0.5m and 15mSv/hr on contact.  It is unlikely that this monitor will ever be cool enough for hands-on elevation adjustment that it requires, therefore it has been bagged, labeled, and transferred to the east hot cell for storage.  

On Monday Oct 5th a decision was made to uncover and remove the T2 Protect Monitor due to faulty readings.  The monitor had been behaving strangely since the September shutdown, and had been getting worse over time.

- Blocks were removed over T2 starting Monday afternoon.  It is necessary to remove the narrow 12' block and two 6' blocks west of the T2 plug block in order to fit the flask frame in for protect monitor removal

- The monitor was moved to the hot cell by 7pm on Monday.  Pierre was operating the crane and there were no issues with the move.  (monitor measured 15mSv/hr at 0.5m)

Oct 6:

- Monitor inspected: a thin piece of foil was found jammed into the entrance side of the monitor (see photos) & a heat or burn mark was seen on the exit side above and to the south of the plate gap.  It is suspected that this material traveled down the beamline at high speed when there was a vacuum burst during the September shutdown.  In light of this information it was decided to remove the T2 target and T1 target as well (see following e-logs)

- Monitor elevation measured: 1835.8mm (april 2015 measurement was 1836.1 --> ok)

- Old monitor cassette removed, new one installed.  Elevation checked: 1832.2mm - did not match, removed, decontaminated, and returned to Probes for adjustment

- Adjusted monitor installed, elevation checked: 1835.8mm --> ok

- Electrical check done by Probes group at hot cell: found left plate shorted to ground

- Cassette removed, decontaminated, and repaired by Probes Group

- Cassette reinstalled, and electrical check repeated --> ok

Oct 7:

- Monitor elevation re-checked: 1836.2mm --> ok

- T2 protect returned to beamline, bolts installed, cables connected

Oct 8:

- Vacuum pumped on T2 volume after T2-MK2 target returned (see next e-log):  Only reached 2 Torr and a leak was heard coming from T2 protect flange.

- T2 protect was unbolted and lifted ~1in for cleaning of the flange base and o-ring

- The T2 volume then pumped down normally

- A helium leak check of all flanges on the T2 monolith was done by Vacuum Group --> no leaks found

 A 1/2 turn twist in the target flask hoist chain has been corrected to address a deficiency observed by inspectors by Gordon Crane.  This was accomplished by first holding the flask door yoke at the top position using rope slings, then lowering the hook block spider approximately 6", then lifting the stationary end of the hoist chain approximately 2" using the Meson Hall main crane to make the top of the chain slack.

A missing cotter pin for the counterweight on the RH HC Lab overhead crane was also installed.

Three used TNF / 500MeV system cooling system resin cans were removed from the Meson Hall target storage pit (two from Hole #1, one which was stored below block #1).

Two new active cans will be returned to Hole #1 after the TNF resin is changed in a few weeks time.

 The lower limit of the flask hoist hook has been adjusted.  The travelling nut for the lower limit was rotated 3 notches closer to the upper limit travelling nut which resulted in an additional 1-3/8" travel of the hook at the lower limit.  The door hinges and door cable pulleys were lubricated with WD-40 and actuation of the doors was tested several times.

test 2