The 2A2M19 beam profile monitor did not work and was e-faulted. After initial troubleshooting 2 blocks were removed form ITW to inspect the entrance module where the beam monitor is installed. The cable was found not to be connected and was quickly fixed. Blocks reinstalled. The work was done by Maico, Travis and Anders

Ucx#10 has been removed from TM4 and placed in a pail with argon.

Ta#44 has been installed onto TM4 and target heater bolts torqed to 130 in.lbs.

Ucx#6 was installed on TM1 on Wednesday.

Ta#39 was removed.

UCx#30 has been removed from TM#4 and put in a can with argon. 5(10) pin connector had to have guide screws removed to be uninstalled.

UCx#31 P2N installed.

UOx was removed from TM4 yesterday and NiO#1 installed.

Video was taken.

Main stand-off insulators continue to deteriorate.

I connected the CS  vacuum system  to TM4. The CS and TM4 turbo pumps are started. Everything is good so far. The HS line will be pressured with helium tomorrow for leak checking. The CS and TM4 will be vented with Argon on Wednesday morning as planned before moved to ITE.

The UCx#9 target has been revomed from the target module...leg A was broken as suspected.

Ta#42 has been installed. High current connection fasteners torqued to 150 in lbs.

UCx #5 has been removed from TM4. The left oven leg is indeed broken.

Target has been placed in a pail with an argon feed.

UCx#46 removed from TM4 and placed into a pail back-filled with argon. Nothing visually unusual; no issues.

November 6, 2024 - Aaron Tam 

UCx#46 Target handover from TPO 

Target insertion: successful 

Parasitic Install: All Parasitic targets left off target

• Left side In-beam array type parasitic install attempt #1 
  • Parasitic assembly is too thin/studs too tall for the socket nut to fasten onto target. Stud protrudes through the length of socket section, not allowing tool to insert 
  • previously a 3/4 spacer was used to give space for thermal couple to enter 
  • Install of 3/4 spacer was difficult because it does not hold its shape when handled (pivots around 1/2 ad 1/4 portions) 
  • With spacer installed, parasitic assembly is too thick for socket nuts to fasten onto studs. 
    • It may have been possible to back out studs to use, but left off in the interest of time UCx is exposed. 

• Right side In-beam window type parasitic install
  • Similarly to Left side, studs were too short for install, studs could be backed out, but was left off in the interest of time UCx exposed

• PEEK seal parasitic targets were left off as per schedule, and will be leak checked at another date (after tong cable has been repaired) 
  • Order of PEEK seal locations preserved and follows order as seen with target installed (Photo attached)

Target install: successful 

Leak Check: Successful 

Electrical Check: Successful 

• Initially failed due to wiring diagram being different between production wiring diagram and electrical test sheet

Containment box panel closed 

On Wednesday, May 22, 2024 UCx#45 was installed on TM4 in the SHC. Installation was normal other then minor issue with the multipin connector drive screw not engaging and/or driving properly. This was remedied by loosening the left guide bolt slightly (1/2 turn). After loosening the multipin drove in and seated correctly (verified by camera). High current fasteners torqued to 130 in lbs.

 To deliver stable beam to RadMol, started heating UCx#43 up again. Target was overheated during initial conditioning in Nov but then ran well for 4 weeks. During the run time, the TGHT voltage jumped around and this was reflected in the ion current, but yields seemed unaffected.

When re-heating it, the TGHT voltage was very unstable and once it got to 440A, it went into voltage limiting mode. We ramped down and it was still voltage limiting, but turning things off solved it. We ramped back up and it did about the same thing. TBHT voltage and current remained steady. Looks like a heat generated issue.

Measured the resistance in the lines from the electrical room. Resistance of the lines to ITE should be 1.19mOhms for TGHT and 1.95mOhms for TBHT. TBHT positive to negative had a resistance of 7.9mOhms from the electrical room today, and 5.7mOhms on module top when measured Nov. 8. This seems to track.

TGHT positive to negative was measured at 27.6mOhms today (and was jumping around), whereas it was 7.14m Ohms on Nov. 8.

10V @ 440A is 22.7mOhms, so it makes sense that it limited. Tried with increased voltage (up to limit of 16V) but this didn't help. Declared the target dead on Jan. 11.

David measured resistances on the module top and found (in mOhms):

A-B = 27 (TGHT)

A-C = 7.473

A-D = 6.380

B-C = 26.053

B-D = 25.569

C-D = 5.212 (TBHT)

So looks like the tube is broken on the B side.

UCx#43 PIE was done in the SHC. As expected based on electrical measurements, the target container was broken on the right side and came off easily. Despite all the black stuff seen on the containment box and source tray, the inside of the heat shield was very clean. Checked if the Re foil was curled in and didn't see anything. Looked fine other than the broken container.

Starting at 11:00 am and finishing at 12:10 Ucx#4 previous target was removed and UCx#4 installed and leak checked on TM1.

During module move to the hot cell UCx#4 was housed in a bag under argon.

 TM4 with UCx#37 was connected in ITE. Attachment available.

UCx#30 has been installed onto TM4 with new high current fasteners torqued to 130 in lbs.

UCx#3 was packaged into a spent can, double bagged and the bag and cans filled with argon as much as possible. Lid was attached and can moved to the storage vault. The target was placed in in Pail 93, and placed into slot 1C of the vault, it was 11.7mSv/hr when removed from the south hot cell. See attached file for latest vault details

UCx#3 has been installed on TM1.

Leak check also complete.

Base Leak Rate 0.0 x 10-9

Pressure 0.0x10-4

Two checks on upper heat shield joint - no response (2 sec spray/check)

Two checks on lower heat shield joint - no response(2 sec spray /check)

10 sec flood of all heat shield joints - no response

Electrical check coomplete.

An autopsy was performed on UCx#3 yesterday afternoon. This autopsy followed the plan written by Anders. Indeed, both sides of the target oven had seperated from the central block.Pictures were taken by Anders and Pierre.

After the disection the target was placed back in a can under argon. Any small piece were placed in a zip lock bag and also put in the can under argon.

chad fisher wrote:

An autopsy was performed on UCx#3 yesterday afternoon. This autopsy followed the plan written by Anders. Indeed, both sides of the target oven had seperated from the central block.Pictures were taken by Anders and Pierre. After the disection the target was placed back in a can under argon. Any small piece were placed in a zip lock bag and also put in the can under argon.

Pictures are available on DocuShare:

https://documents.triumf.ca/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-8189

ISAC e-log entries:

https://web.accel.triumf.ca/isac_elog/Elog_shift_view.pl?shiftid=10803

See attachment for autopsy plan.