Ta#39 has been transferred to spent target storage vault. Ta#39 was placed into pail #106 and placed into spot of 4C of the spent target vault. The pail measured 95.8mSv/hr upon removal from the hot cell. See attached PDF for details.

TM#3 with no target and no source tray was moved from the north east silo to the south hot cell the move went well.

I have inspected the service tray water block and suggest that they SHOULD be cleaned/polished before we install the new source tray.

The water blocks have slight water scalling to the inside of the ID of where the c seals locate.

I have taken two close up  pictures of each water block for reference and to document their current state. They can be found at http://documents.triumf.ca/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-10841
 

Results of electrical check on Ta#40 target on TM#4 post beam at the south hot cell

Electrical check on TM#4 with SiC#29 has been done. The reading of the magnet coil and 60kV common is low at 750 ohms, normally this infinite. Awaiting further instruction on if this is a pass or fail. See attached PDF for the rest of the details.

to reduce the radioactive shining from  SHC Ta# 40 target.

TM#3 and its new source tray have been both moved into the south hot cell.

The water block sealing surfaces on the module-side of TM3 were polished this week by Chad Fisher, using his air-ratchet controlled rotating head tools (single and double-surface polishing tools).

Photos of the polishing tools in-use are attached (from August 16 - 21, 2013)

Scotch-brite pads were used, followed by 2000 grit sandpaper, then white felt with isopropanol, then lint-free dry polishing pads, each on detachable heads that are used with the polishing tool.

The module-side water block surfaces were inspected by Grant Minor on 21 Aug 2013 using a level telescope and camera looking through the hot cell window.  Results can be viewed here, with photos indicating which block is being viewed in sequence.

https://documents.triumf.ca/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-11251

After a great struggle with the water block jigs, the TM3 source tray was finally advanced fully into the service tray and all water blocks were connected and torqued to spec in the hot cell by Chad Fisher.

Notes and description of problems encountered during the installation:

- The water lines for the optics tray interfered with the module-side water block jig, and had to be bent out of the way to clear while advancing the tray (see attached photos)

- The water block jig on the source tray side was too low relative to the module side, and had to be eventually unbolted completely from it's mounting bracket in order to raise it up into alignment

- A piece of aluminum plate was placed under the jig, and the pneumatic table was raised in order to move the jig upwards

- After many repeated attempts to engage the blocks by pressing the jigs together, it was discovered that some of the blocks had rotational misalignment with their respective counterparts on the module side, preventing the pins from engaging properly

- By looking through the bolt holes on several of the blocks, it was possible to determine which direction they had to be rotated

- Chads polishing tool was used to apply some torque to rotate the source-tray-side water blocks slightly so proper alignment of the pins could be achieved

- See the attached photo which indicates which blocks had to be rotated (blocks 5, 6, 9, 10, and 11)

- The blocks had the bolts installed and were also torqued in the numbered order shown in the attached photo

Next steps are to remove the water block jigs, re-connect the loosened brackets for the remaining water lines (entrance window, optics tray), re-install the containment box and associated VCR connectors, video inspect, and leak check.

While continuing on the TM3 Rev 3 source tray installation, Chad noticed today that one of the steerer wires is broken and has come out of the thermocouple-style connecter block (see attached photos).

From drawing ITA2826 (Rev D02 attached) it is likely that this is for either the "upper" or "right side" steerer plate.

Today Chad finished making all connections to the new source tray, except for:

- steerers - broken wire, must be repaired at a later date

- IMG gauge - bracket required, old bracket thrown out with previous tray by accident, see ITA3301, must be installed at a later date

- entrance window - the window lines on module side were left blanked-off for leak checking, containment box must be removed in the next few days to complete steerer repairs so these lines were not connected to save work from having to be repeated

The containment box was replaced, and TM3 was moved to the CS for pump-down and leak checking (see other e-log).  David reported at 6:15 pm that the turbos were turned on at the CS and the vacuum looked normal (so far).

As stated above, Chad realized today that he had thrown out the old IMG gauge bracket with the previous source tray, and a new one must be manufactured.  The assembly is described by ITA3301.  Three components must be manufactured (ITA3302, ITA3303, and ITA2673).  A stock split-ring clamp for ITA2673 (MDC #716001) was graciously donated by Dimo Yosifov.  Grant Minor submitted a work order to the machine shop today for 2 each of ITA3302 and ITA3303.

TM#1 with UCx #6 has been moved to the south hot cell.

TM#1 with UCx#7 electrical check, numbers look good, see PDF for details.

Spent target move, UC#6 has been moved from the south hot cell to the target storage. The target is in pail 108 and in slot 8C of the vault. See attached PDF for details.

The heat shield circuit was pressurized with air (15-20 psi) and snoop applied to the water block joint and brazes. Bubbles formed at the joint between the two water blocks indicating that the leak is a c seal problem. Pictures attached but also on docushare Collection-11285.

chad fisher wrote:

The heat shield circuit was pressurized with air (15-20 psi) and snoop applied to the water block joint and brazes. Bubbles formed at the joint between the two water blocks indicating that the leak is a c seal problem. Pictures attached but also on docushare Collection-11285.

 Last night prior to this leak check the Heat Shield was pumped on and helium sprayed on the circuit. The pressure was 0.0 x 10^-4 Torr. The leak was traced to water block. response time was 2 seconds and went from 5.5 x 10^-8 to 1.6 x 10^-6 atm*cc/sec. There was also a response without spraying helium (drift from the nozzle). The results of this testing prompted the testing completed in Chads elog.

Bevan Moss wrote:

chad fisher wrote: The heat shield circuit was pressurized with air (15-20 psi) and snoop applied to the water block joint and brazes. Bubbles formed at the joint between the two water blocks indicating that the leak is a c seal problem. Pictures attached but also on docushare Collection-11285.  Last night prior to this leak check the Heat Shield was pumped on and helium sprayed on the circuit. The pressure was 0.0 x 10^-4 Torr. The leak was traced to water block. response time was 2 seconds and went from 5.5 x 10^-8 to 1.6 x 10^-6 atm*cc/sec. There was also a response without spraying helium (drift from the nozzle). The results of this testing prompted the testing completed in Chads elog.

 Please find attached some schematics which help illustrate the setup for this heat-shield circuit leak check.

 Today Chad entered the south hot cell on work permit 2013-08-29-3 to repair the leaking heat shield line. The heat shield line was removed from the module and the surfaces cleaned. New C seals and spring were inserted and the line re-attached. During this time Chad also installed the new vacuum gauge. Grant took video of this work and Keith some pictures. The video and pictures can be found on the M: drive (groups) in the RH folder. The total time taken was ~ 25 minutes. The line was then pumped on and the block was sprayed with helium. The pressure and leak rate started at 0.0 x 10^-4 Torr and 4.0 x 10^-8 atm*cc/Sec. When the helium tank was opened there was an immediate response with the leak rate climbing to 2.7 x 10^-7 atm*cc/Sec. It then stabilized at 2.0 x 10^-7 atm*cc/Sec and was sprayed with helium. Response time was ~2 seconds the leak rate climbed to ~2.3 x 10^-5 atm*cc/Sec the pressure also increased to ~3.0 x 10^-3. The leak detector cart was left attached for another 1.5 hours but still was not able to stabilize in the 10^-9atm*cc/Sec range.