CS  vacuum system has been connected to TM3 for control system test(Dave.Morris).

CS roughing pump is started for TM4 and UCX 11 target.

CS water cooling and vacuum system have been turned off at 10:00 AM this morning.The TM3 will be disconnected and moved to silo tomorrow morning.

CS and TM4 was vented with Argon gas this morning before it was moved from CS to ITE.

Dan and I vented CS and TM1 with Argon gas before it is moved this morning.

CS TP1S had been replaced with a new TP-301 pump this morning.The old pump was broken last week.

Over the course of September 9th - September 13, 2024 a CRL manipulator technician carried out the following manipulator maintenance:

NHC operator side arm #9763 (right side installed position) - Inspection and re-tensioning of tong cable prior to re-installation (was a little too tight). Operational.

E-HD clean spare #8015 - repaired stuck manual 'Z' motion - removed one rouge 5-40 screw that had been dropped inside remote end during 'Z' motion cable run through in 2017, found that related 5-40 screws from the cable end clamp were not tight and therefore proud and also jamming. Complete tape replacement and tensioning. This manipulator is fully back to operational status other then needing some screw for the air restriction on the remote end.

E-HD "dirty" spare #7985 - inspection and evaluation of parts on the operator side require to return to operational status. Wrist and handle reassembled (all parts of wrist and handle accounted for) Ball and socket joint at and of motion lock replaced (parts were on hand already) as well as tape motion lock assembly (parts on hand already). This arm may be missing a relay or two. Remote side still bagged with unrecorded issue (suspect it is only a broken tong cable) this will be put in the maintenance schedule for earl 2025.

NHC operator side "spare" arm #9351 - Damaged 'Z' motion tape replaced. Tensioning. Operational once 'Y' motion linear actuator re-installed.

Meson hall warm cell manipulators evaluated/inspected - No issue found

The C2 circuit (coil 2) water lines and blocks have been revoed from TM4.

Water block jig could not be used as the window water block connection was nowhere near fitting into the jig (IMG_1224 image below) and therefore caused an interference causing the rest of the blocks to not mate with the jig. A different tool that has never been used was implimented and sucessful (IMG_1227 below).

 Sorry about the picture numbering format...new format will be implimented next time.

As per scedule TM2 containment box has been removed.

Circuit D has passed the vacuum leak check. Jig has been removed and containment box re-installed for move to conditioning station.

 This e-log is to cover the work completed from September 9th until the 11th. 

September 9th

Today Maico completed the leak checking blank off and leak checking tool (to replace the one that was contaminated). This tool was then leak checked with C-seals and no springs at the machine shop, both halves were determined to be leak tight. 2 sets of small c-seals without divots were selected and used for leak checking the module side and the source tray side. The heat shield line was tested in the ante-room and was determined to leak. Upon further investigation it was determined that the bore of the seal gland was determined to be over sized (0.450"). Isaac then installed the blank off onto the module and pump down was started, the testing car would not stabilize so Isaac tried turning the screw more allowing for further pump down. The leak check was then completed and there was no response. The flow of helium for the target module was checked but was much lower than typical as the second valve was not fully opened. 

September 10th

With the belief that the larger bore in combination with the small c-seals was the cause of the leak Maico found and polished another block that also had a larger bore. Once polished, small c-seals without dimples were selected and tested with the machine shop leak testing cart. These seals were leak tight but upon investigation the crush zone in one section of the seals was significantly reduced. The smallest width of the crush zone was measured to be ~0.007". This result is concerning as it means that larger bore water blocks can be sealed with small c-seals but once installed there is no way to tell one block from the other. There is no data on the lifetime of this combination of seal and bore. 

Following this test a small c-seal with dimples was selected and checked in the large bore. This combination resulted in a significant leak. Following that test the large c-seals were crushed in the larger bore water block. The torque required to crush the seal and to have the faces touch was more than that of a small c-seal regardless of what size bore it was crushed in. However with the larger bore the large c-seals could be completely crushed allowing for the copper faces to touch (the total force on the faces is unknown). The crushed seal was then inspected, it had a nice uniform crush zone that was relatively large when compared to a properly crushed small c-seal. Another testing with the large seal and a 0.025" wire diameter spring was completed. It was found that the wire interferes with the the seal when it exits from the groove. This interference causes a localized increased crushed zone but does not reduce the crush elsewhere or prevent the copper faces from touching. At this point it was decided to repair the heat shield using large seals. Large seals with springs were tested on the actual HS line in the anteroom and yielded that same results. The line was then installed by Maico inside the HC. It pumped down to the lower limit of the leak testing cart and sprayed with helium, no leak was detected. The containment box was then put back on by Isaac and Grant in preparation for a module move.

September 11th

Today the containment box installation was completed and the module moved. Following that Maico and myself entered into the ante-room and retrieved the blank off block from the HC via the tool port. The large c-seal used in the test and the small ones used in the blank off were then collected and bagged. The large c-seal had typical measurements. The small c-seals used in the blank off did not have typical measurements. They had not been compressed as much and the crush zone was near impossible to see (if visible at all). From the measurements it is believed that the block was not sufficiently tightened. It also calls into question the validity of the leak check due to the combination of less helium and reduced crush. 

After these measurements the tools that were contaminated but were to be recovered were bagged and checked by safety. They have been moved to the jacks area where Maico will decontaminate them. The old wiring harness from TM3 was bagged and given to safety for storage in the cyclotron tunnel. The plastic and all of the garbage was then lifted, bagged, and removed from the ante room. Safety surveyed the anteroom following this no alpha contamination was found but there was 5000 counts on the floor of the ante room. The contamination may have existed prior to this work.

Many pictures of the cseals have been taken and have been put into \\trwindata\remote handling\Photos\2013\2013_tm3_source_tray_refurb. A report detailing all of the testing and results would be invaluable.  

 Today Maico completed the new leak testing tool and blank off. He tested them with C-seals without springs and all was leak tight. He then inspected the crushed seals and noticed that there was an area that was crushed less on both seals (more prominent in one,  20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020975) and that this reduced crushed zone only appears on one side of the seal. This is similar to the failure seen on both sets of the heat shield lines. On the seal with the greatest change in crush zone the average crush zone was ~0.025 and the reduced crush zone was ~0.012". He inspected the leak tester and the blank off and determined they were within tolerance and that they had a total seal goove height of 0.074" which is nominal. New seals were selected and one had a visible dimple prior to crushing (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020978)  and the other had some defects on the inside (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020962). These defects were marked and crushed using the same leak testing tool and blank off. The seal with the dimple showed a reduced crush zone in the same area (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1030021) and the seal with the defects on the inside showed less or undetectable change in crush zone. Maico then inspected (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020991) and crushed the "thicker seals" (more indium coating). When inserting the seals he noticed that they fit tight on the counter bore of the blank off. He then attempted to crush the seal to the point where the copper faces would touch (as design intent) but the seal locked. The gap between the 2 copper faces was measured to be ~0.001". This setup was leak tested and found to be leak tight. When inspecting the crushed thicker seals it was found that the material had actually been pushed sideways causing a lip to form around the crush zone (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1030003). Maico then fitted the wires for the testing of the module and the heat shield line. 

Bevan Moss wrote:

Today Maico completed the new leak testing tool and blank off. He tested them with C-seals without springs and all was leak tight. He then inspected the crushed seals and noticed that there was an area that was crushed less on both seals (more prominent in one,  20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020975) and that this reduced crushed zone only appears on one side of the seal. This is similar to the failure seen on both sets of the heat shield lines. On the seal with the greatest change in crush zone the average crush zone was ~0.025 and the reduced crush zone was ~0.012". He inspected the leak tester and the blank off and determined they were within tolerance and that they had a total seal goove height of 0.074" which is nominal. New seals were selected and one had a visible dimple prior to crushing (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020978)  and the other had some defects on the inside (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020962). These defects were marked and crushed using the same leak testing tool and blank off. The seal with the dimple showed a reduced crush zone in the same area (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1030021) and the seal with the defects on the inside showed less or undetectable change in crush zone. Maico then inspected (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1020991) and crushed the "thicker seals" (more indium coating). When inserting the seals he noticed that they fit tight on the counter bore of the blank off. He then attempted to crush the seal to the point where the copper faces would touch (as design intent) but the seal locked. The gap between the 2 copper faces was measured to be ~0.001". This setup was leak tested and found to be leak tight. When inspecting the crushed thicker seals it was found that the material had actually been pushed sideways causing a lip to form around the crush zone (20130906_tm3sourtrayefurb_P1030003). Maico then fitted the wires for the testing of the module and the heat shield line.

 Hello all,

As an addendum to Bevan's e-Log:

Maico also prepared eight (8) new retainer spring windings out of the .025" diameter stainless welding wire for the next seals that we will attempt in the Hot Cell and Ante Room

Maico, Bevan, Keith and I had a discussion about the bolt torque related to the c-seal and water block compression:
- It was found that not much torque is required to compress the "standard" design "thin" c-seals (Ultra-Seal P/N 50606 .001 - .0015 thou indium plating) - basically hand tight only with an allen wrench
- By hand-tightening the bolts with an allen key until the faces of the blocks came together, and then measuring the torque with a torque wrench, Maico discovered that about 8 foot-lbs = 96 inch-lbs (or 5/8ths of a turn past finger tight) was required
- The c-seals are fully compressed when the faces of the blocks are contacting... any additional torque applied is only to pre-load the bolts to ensure that they do not come loose due to temperature cycling and mechanical vibration
- Chad's Hot Cell torque tool is nominally set to about 168 - 180 inch-lbs (or about 14 to 15 foot lbs) based on an e-mail update from him 3-June-2013 - this torque is normal chart torque for a 1/4"-28 UNF SAE Grade 8 bolt pre-load of 3,250 lbs
- see http://www.imperialsupplies.com/pdf/A_FastenerTorqueCharts.pdf
- This amount of bolt pre-load torque may not be required if the bolts are SAE Grade 5.  I recommend at this point that the minimum possible pre-load torque be applied to achieve the chart recommended pre-load for the grade of the bolt, which should be investigated
- This is to ensure that we do not over-stress the thread inserts on the water blocks... if these inserts are damaged, we will basically render the service chase unusable and ruin the module

Cheers,

Grant

C#4 spent target was moved to the storage vault, in pail 277. Dose rate at approximately 1 m when leaving the hot cell was 164 mSv/h. The pail has been placed in vault location 4C. See updated vault layout attached.

Target to HS is 400 ohm. The rest check is good. See attachment.

Target C#1 has been installed on TM4 with new high current fasteners torqued to 130in lbs.

 Today while putting the cover on the cord that goes to the controller was bumped. This bent the connector down and caused a vacuum leak. I tried to tighten the bolts in the hope the leak would go away but it did not and I sheared one of the bolts off. David is inquiring with Edi if the pump can be repaired or if it needs to be replaced. The good news is that the interlocks work exactly as planned. Upon detecting a leak they shut the turbos down and closed all of the valves they even beat the turbo controllers for overload.

David believes we can rotate the pump slightly to avoid this problem in the future. Hopefully repairs can start on Monday. 

The conditioning station will be shut down for the weekend.

Broken TM2:TP2 has been replaced otday by a new TV-1001 nav pump supplied by vacuum group. replaced pump seris number:201281. new pump series number:IT23431008. TPs replacement history sheet will be updated by Frank. I will put comment on this e fault and let operator to close it.

The containment box has been removed from TM2 and the water block jig installed in preparation for water block polishing.

 Blocks 1-4 have been moved from ITW to ITE. Block 5 was moved to a storage area as it will be in the way of the harp repair. Danka took air samples and found 200 counts of alpha on the air samples but nothing on the swipes. It is recommended that resporators be worn while blocks are being lifted and lowered. She will check the monitor tomorrow to confirm it is behaving as it should.