TM3 is disconnected at TCS and ready to be moved to silo.

TM#3, no target, has been moved from the conditioning station to the north east silo.

All water circuits are by passed on the top of TM3. Water pumps and vacuum turbo- pumps are started. Everything is ready for TM3 camera sparking check.

David Wang wrote:

All water circuits are by passed on the top of TM3. Water pumps and vacuum turbo- pumps are started. Everything is ready for TM3 camera sparking check.

 Wednesday November 30st: <br>

- 3 cameras (1 UV and 2 regular cameras)  were installed in the Service cap and the module was pumped down.  1 UV and 1 regular were placed on the East side of the module, aiming to water lines entering the Service Tray; 1 regular camera was placed on the South side of the module, aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators.

- started pumping down. <br>

Thursday, December 1st: <br>

- 1st HV test done. TM3 started sparking above 20kV. The cameras responses were consistent with the sparks. However, the screens were flickering and it was not clear if the responses were due to electromagnetic interferences; or due to cameras' gain change caused by high intensity light due to sparking.<br>

- added helium using the regulating valve. same results were found; <br>

Friday, December 2nd: <br>

- vented the module. <br>

- shielded the cameras' cables with aluminum tape. <br>

- removed 2 blue insulator (EE and HS) and shortened them by 1". They were found too long: HS blue insulator touching the horizontal HV water line; and the EE blue insulator at 2-3mm far from the HV water line; re-installed both shortened blue insulators.<br>

- changes the location of the cameras: 1 regular camera taped to the UV camera were placed South, aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators; 1 regular camera was kept on the East side of the module, also aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators. <br>

- started pumping down. <br>

Saturday, December 3rd: <br>

- 2nd HV test was done, with cameras' installed as mentioned above. results were consistent with the first test results. <br>

- added helium. results were the same. <br>

- vented and changed the location of the cameras: 1 regular camera taped to the UV camera were placed at the top of the Service Tray (South-West corner) aiming down the Service Tray; 1 regular camera was kept (its setup was not touched at all) on the East side of the module, aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators. <br>

- attempted to pump down, but the module was leaking. reopened the flanges, cleaned them, attempted again to pump down, but it showed a bigger leak. <br>

Sunday, December 4th: <br>

- the third attempt to pump down was successful (without reopening the module!). <br>

Monday, December 5th: <br>

- did the 3rd HV test with the cameras installed as described on December 3rd. same results as before were seen. <br>

- again helium was added and same results were noticed. <br>

- stopped pumps and prepared for venting to relocate the cameras lower in the Service Tray.

Aurelia Laxdal wrote:

David Wang wrote: All water circuits are by passed on the top of TM3. Water pumps and vacuum turbo- pumps are started. Everything is ready for TM3 camera sparking check.  Wednesday November 30st: <br> - 3 cameras (1 UV and 2 regular cameras)  were installed in the Service cap and the module was pumped down.  1 UV and 1 regular were placed on the East side of the module, aiming to water lines entering the Service Tray; 1 regular camera was placed on the South side of the module, aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators. - started pumping down. <br> Thursday, December 1st: <br> - 1st HV test done. TM3 started sparking above 20kV. The cameras responses were consistent with the sparks. However, the screens were flickering and it was not clear if the responses were due to electromagnetic interferences; or due to cameras' gain change caused by high intensity light due to sparking.<br> - added helium using the regulating valve. same results were found; <br> Friday, December 2nd: <br> - vented the module. <br> - shielded the cameras' cables with aluminum tape. <br> - removed 2 blue insulator (EE and HS) and shortened them by 1". They were found too long: HS blue insulator touching the horizontal HV water line; and the EE blue insulator at 2-3mm far from the HV water line; re-installed both shortened blue insulators.<br> - changes the location of the cameras: 1 regular camera taped to the UV camera were placed South, aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators; 1 regular camera was kept on the East side of the module, also aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators. <br> - started pumping down. <br> Saturday, December 3rd: <br> - 2nd HV test was done, with cameras' installed as mentioned above. results were consistent with the first test results. <br> - added helium. results were the same. <br> - vented and changed the location of the cameras: 1 regular camera taped to the UV camera were placed at the top of the Service Tray (South-West corner) aiming down the Service Tray; 1 regular camera was kept (its setup was not touched at all) on the East side of the module, aiming at the bottom of the blue insulators. <br> - attempted to pump down, but the module was leaking. reopened the flanges, cleaned them, attempted again to pump down, but it showed a bigger leak. <br> Sunday, December 4th: <br> - the third attempt to pump down was successful (without reopening the module!). <br> Monday, December 5th: <br> - did the 3rd HV test with the cameras installed as described on December 3rd. same results as before were seen. <br> - again helium was added and same results were noticed. <br> - stopped pumps and prepared for venting to relocate the cameras lower in the Service Tray.

 Monday, December 5th (Con't): <br>

- vented and changed the location of the cameras;<br>

- the UV camera was placed (tapped on an aluminum spacer and on the grounded water lines) at the middle of the Service Tray (right below the first Mykroy insulator-plate) aiming down the Service Tray (at the second Mykroy insulator-plate and water lines) ; <br>

- 1 regular camera was placed right below the UV camera, also using a spacer (taped with the camera on grounded water lines) and also aiming down the Service Tray (at the second Mykroy insulator-plate and water lines);  The spacer for this camera had 300counts on it after it was removed from TM3, after the test;<br>

- NOTE: when installing the 1st regular camera: dropped a small allen key in the Service Tray. It landed on last insulator with the epoxi and water lines, between the first HV line and the wall of the grounded Service Tray.  This insulator is down below in the Service tray. Used a magnet stick to recuperate the allen key. <br>

- the 2nd regular camera was placed at the top of the Service Tray (tapped on the grounded water lines) looking down at the first Mykroy insulator-plate and water lines. NOTE: this camera had a filter applied to its lens. <br>

- pumped down <br>

Tuesday, December 6th:<br>

- did the 4th HV test with the cameras installed as described on December 5rd Tuesday morning very early . Same results as before were seen, except that the top camera (2nd regular camera) with the filter applied to its lens was flickering less than the other 2 cameras, and for small sparks this camera was not reacting at all. <br>

- vented shortly after the 4th test and relocated the cameras for the 5th HV test (last test); <br>

- placed only 2 regular cameras in the Service Tray;<br>

- 1 regular camera was placed right below the 2nd Mykroy insulator-plate, aiming down the Service Tray at the last insulator with the epoxi and water lines (this insulator is down below in the Service tray); <br>

- the 1st regular camera was placed a level up in the Service Tray, right below the 1st Mykroy insulator-plate, aiming down the Service Tray at the 2nd Mykroy insulator-plate; <br>

- NOTE: no spacers were used<br>

- pumped down and did the 5th HV test with the cameras installed as described above in the evening; <br>

- again same results as before were seen: the camera with the filter applied to its lens was flickering less than the other camera, and for small sparks this camera was not reacting at all. <br>

- NOTE: for this last test heard sparks outside (at atmosphere) when the HV was pushed at 26kV; <br>

Wednesday, December 7th:<br>

- vented and removed the cameras from TM3. No contamination was found on the cameras and wires. <br>

- TM3 was moved to the silo.<br>

 TM#3 is now in the south hot cell.

 We have a ram installed on SHC pole which is 0.5 meter to  module shielding block surface. the readings we got today during TM3 move:
at containment box center (highest reading): 3.14 msv/hr.
at bottom  of shielding blocks: 960 usv/hr.
at 1/4  of  shielding blocks height from  bottom :700usv/hr.
at 1/2 of shielding blocks height from bottom: 340usv/hr.
at 3/4 of shielding blocks height from bottom:140u/sv/hr.
   The Ram is behind the pole and measured the surface which is 90 degree right side of that opened service tray side. 

Electrical check of TM#3 with no target at the south hot cell

Found spark signs on TM3's containment on the side of the water blocks. They may be OLD or/and NEW sparking signs, but this in not determined at this moment. Please see picture: first attachment. First and second attachment show the profiles of water block and HV lines.

A video inspection of the lower service tray was performed this morning. Camera was inserted upwards into the service tray/service chase from the containment box. One potential spark mark was identified as well as epoxy not flush with insulator. Fiberglass does not extend into service tray/chase much and does not look, from initial inspection that it will be too difficult to remove.

Video can be found in docushare Document-142295

containment box was re-installed onto TM3 on Monday, Left manipulator may be showing signs of eminent handle or tong cable failure.

 TM#3 has been moved from the north east silo to the south hot cell.

the containment box has been removed from TM3.

chad fisher wrote:

A video inspection of the lower service tray was performed this morning. Camera was inserted upwards into the service tray/service chase from the containment box. One potential spark mark was identified as well as epoxy not flush with insulator. Fiberglass does not extend into service tray/chase much and does not look, from initial inspection that it will be too difficult to remove. Video can be found in docushare Document-142295

 The attached picture is from the video: showing the fiber glass inside the Service Tray.

Please see the first two pictures of the HV test at atmosphere done on April 19.

First picture shows a big spark between the Extraction Electrode mounting plate holder (at HV) to the Ground Electrode. Please note minimum gap between these electrodes is 7.8mm.

However the biggest visible spark was noticed at the bottom screw hole. (It is difficult to determine if at the 7.8mm gap were concomitant sparks occurring.)This spark started at 22kV and became stable above 24kV.

On April 20, 2017 Chad inspected this area with the Hot Cell camera and found a spark mark on the Extraction Electrode holder plate at the bottom screw hole. See the third picture.

Again it is very difficult with the existing Hot Cell cameras to inspect the areas where the gap is small (at 7.8mm gap between the conical surfaces of the Ground Electrode and Extraction Electrode holder)

In the second picture there are 2 small sparks: one on the top and another one on the right side at the lines wrapped in Fiber Glass. These sparks started at 20kV.

On April 21 the HV test was repeated with the Containment box ON and the sparks occurred again, at the same locations and at the same voltage.

Please see TM3's Updated Schedule (the current schedule) at the SHC and TCS.

For the record I am uploading TM3's Initial Schedule at the SHC and TCS.

Today a HV test at atmosphere was performed for Each Line(s), while floating the other lines.

Please note the Einzel Lens line (Y) was grounded.

Tests performed:

1. Applied up to 29kV to "(A) OVEN -"

Sparks occurred at 29kV at the Fiber Glass inside the Service Tray; and at the right side at the lines wrapped in Fiber Glass.

2. Applied up to 29kV to "(B) OVEN +"

Sparks occurred at 29kV at the Fiber Glass inside the Service Tray.

3. Applied up to 6-7kV to "(C) TUBE -"

Could not identify the sparks; it was a continuous discharge.

4. Applied up to 6-7kV to "(D) TUBE +"

Sparks/discharges occurred at 6-7kV at the Fiber Glass on the right side at the lines wrapped in Fiber Glass. We had to turn OFF the lights in the Hot Cell to identify the small sparks.

5. Applied up to 4kV to "(P-Q) COIL +"

Discharge occurred at 4kV. Could not identify it.

6. Applied up to 29kV to "(R-U) COIL -"

Sparks occurred around 27-29kV at the Fiber Glass inside the Service Tray; and at the right side at the lines wrapped in Fiber Glass.

Tom saw a spark at 27kV between the Extraction Electrode holder and the Ground Electrode.

Saw also a spark at the Ring Alumina insulator in the Service Tray, located on top of the second comb insulator with Epoxi.

7. Applied up to 27kV to "(E) Cavity or MSP, (G) Gas, (J) Heat Shield" - all these are connected together at the BIAS voltage.

Sparks occurred at 27kV at the Fiber Glass inside the Service Tray.

8. Applied up to 23kV to "(I) EE" - this is for the Extraction Electrode.

Sparks occurred at 23kV again at the same spot near the bottom screw hole, between the Extraction Electrode holder and the Ground Electrode.

9. Applied up to 27kV to "(F) Plasma"- this is for the Anode.

Sparks occurred at 26-27kV again at the same spot near the bottom screw hole, between the Extraction Electrode holder and the Ground Electrode.

Please see attachment for TM3 May 1-15, 2017 Tentative Schedule at the SHC and TCS.

Fiberglass, capton tape and tie straps have been removed from TM3.

RU( coil 1), F (anode), and 60kv bias(HS, Gasline, and MSP)  are shorted together. Other lines are good.  They are measured between  individual line each other  @500V. The megga showed OL. All of  them to ground are OL @500V as well. EL is grounded during check.