OLIS Logbook General
  General, Page 1 of 26  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Type Categoryup Subject
  1   Thu May 14 11:07:33 2009 Hossein Rafighi  Test

Testing!

  3   Fri May 15 14:12:45 2009 Geoff Wight  1st test

test

  6   Fri May 22 12:31:36 2009 Raymond Dubé  Test
Hello world
  67   Mon Jul 13 09:49:52 2009 Damien Gallop  18O4+ tuning to TIGRESS today

As per our agreed deal last week, today is reserved for Supernanogan tuning to TIGRESS. Development will resume tomorrow.

There was a power bump overnight that knocked out many systems, including OLIS. The ISAC elog mentions something about it here. It seems that Keerthi restarted the source. (Note to self: Write an ION with brief restart instructions for the Supernanogan.) 18O4+ beam was left on FC6, and it is very nice, as you can see. Sophia has the beam now.

Attachment 1: Picture_19.png
Picture_19.png
  68   Mon Jul 13 17:19:29 2009 Damien Gallop  MCIS vacuum trip at ~15:30

An MCIS vacuum trip occurred somewhere around 15:30. Sophia observed a drop-off in beam. The cause looks like the PLC-related business that we have experienced many times before. This fault has not manifested itself for quite a while, since Controls firewalled the MCIS portion of the network on March 30th.

Attachment 1: grab.Z26697.png
grab.Z26697.png
  69   Mon Jul 13 17:41:04 2009 Damien Gallop  Supernanogan development Monday morning

As noted, Keerthi was called to restart the source after a power bump. He continued Supernanogan development through the night (can you imagine?!?). He made some great progress. Here is a partial summary of his findings.

Actions taken: frequency scans across the entire range from 12-16GHz for each charge state of 18O.

For 18O4+, the "perfect" resonance occurred at 13.00GHz, with other resonances at 13.26, 13.54, 13.74... i.e. at about 26MHz intervals. The lowest resonance is the least noisy. However, if it trips, it is also impossible to restart it without playing with the RF. Based on Keerthi's instructions, I have written up a draft of an ION note for Operations, describing how to restart the Supernanogan source if it trips. I have asked the operators to critique the draft. The present RF state is attached below.

Attachment 1: Picture_20.png
Picture_20.png
  70   Tue Jul 14 09:47:14 2009 Damien Gallop  18O4+ tuning to TIGRESS this morning

We have a change of schedule. Due to circumstances, Sophia will continue tuning to TIGRESS this morning. Sgan Development will resume this afternoon.

Details: The beam path through the TIGRESS chamber is clear presently, and no detectors are mounted. It is the perfect time to send a nA pilot beam to the end of the line. TIGRESS intends to install electronics starting at noon. Sophia expects to have tuning comfortably completed by then also. She and I have agreed to the following schedule: 

Day Principal Time
Tuesday Sophia 09:00-13:00
Tuesday Damien 14:00-17:00
Wednesday Damien 09:00-17:00
Thursday Damien 09:00-17:00
Friday Damien 09:00-11:00
Friday Sophia 11:00-handoff to user

Note: An SC vacuum issue arose this morning, which truncated Sophia's tuning efforts for today. We have agreed to a slightly earlier handover time on Friday, so that she can tune through the chamber. It will be more difficult, as there will be detectors installed by then.

Beam has been on FC6 for an hour or so. It looks pretty good. Stripchart attached. Save: 090714_1231.snapmcissebt3a. Note: There is something fishy about the slit panels. I think an IOC got rebooted somewhere along the line, and the slit motors are out of calibration. I have recorded the pot values in the save file. Emittance scan of Sopohia's 18O4+ beam appended.

Attachment 1: grab.qY4388.png
grab.qY4388.png
Attachment 2: grab.Ad4475.png
grab.Ad4475.png
Attachment 3: grab.ny4479.png
grab.ny4479.png
Attachment 4: grab.JM4695.png
grab.JM4695.png
Attachment 5: grab.pJ4699.png
grab.pJ4699.png
Attachment 6: grab.kh4703.png
grab.kh4703.png
Attachment 7: grab.kf4707.png
grab.kf4707.png
  71   Tue Jul 14 15:19:51 2009 Damien Gallop  MCIS mass scan

I have begun a mass scan from 0 to 25. It will be a while. Data file: masscorr_mcis__0-25_090714.txt. 25nA of 18O4+ restored to FC6.

Attachment 1: grab.qQ4911.png
grab.qQ4911.png
  72   Wed Jul 15 09:20:26 2009 Damien Gallop  Supernanogan development in progress

Proposed run plan for this time:

  • Document TIGRESS tune.
  • 18O4+ emittance scan.
  • Mass scan A/q = 0 to 25.
  • Repeat 18On+ emittance scans at present RF frequency. 
  • 16On+ emittance scans at present frequency.
  • Plot 16On+ & 18On+ emittance on one graph.
  • If indicated, then do 17On+ background study.
  • Open 17O gas bottle to system.
  • 17On+ resonance survey based on 18On+ results.
  • 17On+ emittance scans.
  • Add 17On+ emittance values to graph.
  73   Wed Jul 15 10:27:18 2009 Damien Gallop  18O4+ overnight and emittance check

Repeat emittance scan of present 18O4+ beam. It compares okay (somewhat broader emittance numbers)  with yesterday's scan. Also attached is FC6 beam overnight. Nice.

Attachment 1: grab.tL7839.png
grab.tL7839.png
Attachment 2: grab.An7844.png
grab.An7844.png
Attachment 3: grab.fH7848.png
grab.fH7848.png
Attachment 4: grab.Jq7854.png
grab.Jq7854.png
  74   Wed Jul 15 10:41:23 2009 Damien Gallop  18O8+ survey

A/q = 2.25 Field = 704.7G FC6 = <pA

Well, it's there, but pretty faint. The attached stripchart shows no beam then beam. FC6 bias has to be revered to see it.

Attachment 1: grab.dg7993.png
grab.dg7993.png
  75   Wed Jul 15 10:51:25 2009 Damien Gallop  18O7+ survey

A/q = 2.571 Field = 752.9 FC6 = 88pA

  76   Wed Jul 15 10:52:25 2009 Damien Gallop  18O6+ survey

A/q = 3 Field = 813.2 FC6 = 2.9nA

Beam is too faint for a good emittance scan, but it's visible. Redo with reverse bias, if possible...

Sideshow: IOSIOC reboot for Maintenance. Recovery protracted... Some MWS bias interlock problem. Also, many optics devices were zeroed. (When will this be fixed anyway?) Fortunately the MCIS optics actually stayed in their prior states.

Later... Request Operations reboot IOSIOC, as interlock condition is still there, and it prevents me from seeing A/q. Nothing to lose. Nothing gained either. Graham is here, and we've been discussing stuff. Recently I got the MWS bias on, with glitches. I can no longer turn it off, but that's fine for me. Let's move forward with emittance now.

After many attempts, here is the first emittance scan. Looks like coarsely ground pepper.

Attachment 1: grab.tG8062.png
grab.tG8062.png
Attachment 2: grab.XH5554.png
grab.XH5554.png
Attachment 3: grab.KF5676.png
grab.KF5676.png
Attachment 4: grab.Lq6258.png
grab.Lq6258.png
Attachment 5: grab.gK6297.png
grab.gK6297.png
Attachment 6: grab.ey6787.png
grab.ey6787.png
Attachment 7: grab.gA6792.png
grab.gA6792.png
  77   Wed Jul 15 14:41:25 2009 Damien Gallop  18O5+ survey

A/q = 3.6 Field = 888.6G FC6 = 10nA

Two emittance scans, one with the as-is emittance rig, one with a manually installed battery for bias.

Attachment 1: grab.Nr6887.png
grab.Nr6887.png
Attachment 2: grab.ag6892.png
grab.ag6892.png
Attachment 3: grab.sV7547.png
grab.sV7547.png
Attachment 4: grab.Sg7555.png
grab.Sg7555.png
  78   Wed Jul 15 16:37:01 2009 Damien Gallop  Bias for IOS emittance rig

Graham looked up the list of IOS bias assignments. None was form the emittance rig. I quickly tested the list in ILT, but nothing jumped out. Keerthi provided a battery setup, which I have now installed. Here are example scans, untouched, of forward and reverse bias. I leave it to you, dear reader, to figure out which is which.

18O4+ beam restored for the night. Take a scan and verify it's restored well. Nice.

Attachment 1: grab.wu7505.png
grab.wu7505.png
Attachment 2: grab.Vo7510.png
grab.Vo7510.png
Attachment 3: grab.le7613.png
grab.le7613.png
Attachment 4: grab.TN7617.png
grab.TN7617.png
  79   Thu Jul 16 14:06:56 2009 Damien Gallop  MCIS vacuum trip overnight

The MCIS vacuum system tripped last night again. Fortunately the operators noticed it and restarted stuff. Otherwise we'd be having a very long day today. This looks exactly like the same MCIS:PV1 trip we've experienced before. Attached is the FC6 beam recovery.

Attachment 1: grab.X15685.png
grab.X15685.png
  80   Thu Jul 16 14:11:43 2009 Damien Gallop  MCOL3 slits calibrations

I ran through a calibration exercise for the IOS slits. Here is my data. I have moved each set to the midpoint of the largest (5mm) slit position. This does not necessarily agree with the book value. Never mind. Leave 'em alone, even though it appears that the numbers are switched (they're not).

 MCOL3A 
Parameter Readback Pot
FC6 90% down at... 4.96 4.93
  10.57 10.66
  17.78 18.01
FW10% max mid-section calculated at... 16.08 15.23
 
FC6 90% up at... 14.35 13.51
  17.77 16.93
FW90% max mid-section calculated at... 16.06 15.22
Previous setting at... 14.04  
Clipping: None.
   
 MCOL3B 
Parameter Readback Pot
FC6 90% down at... 4.96 4.93
  10.57 10.66
  17.78 18.01
FW10% max mid-section calculated at... 14.18 14.34
 
FC6 90% up at... 12.69 12.91
  15.27 15.57
FW90% max mid-section calculated at... 13.98 14.24
Previous setting at... 16.11  
Clipping: 25.5enA (Out) -> 24.0enA (5mm)

Check 18O4+ emittance and compare with yesterday: good. Note again that emittance rig is running with manually-fitted reverse bias.

Attachment 1: grab.k15763.png
grab.k15763.png
Attachment 2: grab.h15767.png
grab.h15767.png
Attachment 3: grab.J15771.png
grab.J15771.png
  81   Thu Jul 16 14:25:27 2009 Damien Gallop  18O4+ survey

A/q = 4.5 Field = 993.5G FC6 = 24.0enA

Attachment 1: grab.x15815.png
grab.x15815.png
Attachment 2: grab.p15822.png
grab.p15822.png
Attachment 3: grab.x15826.png
grab.x15826.png
  82   Thu Jul 16 14:41:46 2009 Damien Gallop  16O8+ survey

A/q = 2 Field = 662.3G FC6 = 150epA (unstable)

No emittance scan possible.

  83   Thu Jul 16 14:44:06 2009 Damien Gallop  18O8+ survey

A/q = 2.25 Field = 702.5G FC6 = not visible

It looks like last night's vacuum trip is biting us here.

ELOG V2.9.2-2455